The High Court examined whether it is appropriate to entertain a ...

High Court Rules Against Premature Writ Petitions on Provisional Attachment Orders Before 30-Day Review Period.

October 9, 2024

Case Laws Money Laundering HC

The High Court examined whether it is appropriate to entertain a writ petition against a Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) issued under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, before the statutory period of 30 days when the Adjudicating Authority is required to examine it. The Supreme Court has upheld the validity of Section 5 of the Act, finding adequate safeguards to give an opportunity to the aggrieved person to file objections before the Adjudicating Authority. The PAO is passed by the Director or authorized officer with reasons based on material in possession. Since sufficient remedies are available under the Act, the High Court held it inappropriate to entertain the petition before the 30-day period expires, except in rare and exceptional cases. The petitioner was relegated to avail alternative remedies, and the Adjudicating Authority was directed to expedite the matter without observations on merits.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court examined whether it is appropriate to entertain a ...

High Court Rules Against Premature Writ Petitions on Provisional Attachment Orders Before 30-Day Review Period.

October 9, 2024

Case Laws Money Laundering HC

You may also like:

Writ petition partly allowed. Order of provisional attachment of petitioner's immovable properties purchased prior to 2014 u/s 5(1) of PML Act set aside as without...

HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a provisional attachment order under PMLA, holding that the petitioner cannot simultaneously pursue a writ petition and a...

Validity of Attachment of Petitioner's Properties Post Assessment Order Set Aside and Refund Adjustment - Provisional attachment - after expiry of period of six months...

Provisional attachment of Bank Accounts - time limitation - In the instant case, provisional attachment was ordered on 09.02.2021. Thus, the period of one year has...

Challenging the validity of show cause notice (SCN) - Recovery of Swachh Bharat Cess - service provided by the petitioner by putting in rail linings - The High Court...

Cancellation of the IEC - EPCG Scheme - levy of penalty - the learned Judge while disposing the writ petition filed by the appellant, challenging the order of...

HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a penalty order under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the limitation period for passing the penalty...

Provisional attachment - Expiry of 80 days mandatory period for confirmation of the provisional attachment u/s 5 of PMLA - Applicability of decision of Supreme Court for...

Provisional orders of attachment issued u/s 83 can be challenged by filing objection u/r 159(5). Petitioner did not file objection. Respondents issued fresh provisional...

Validity of Provisional attachment - Admittedly, except saying that the orders of provisional attachment are passed in order to protect the interest of the Government...

When authorities of Enforcement Directorate (ED) have reasons to believe, based on material, that any person possesses proceeds of crime and is likely to conceal or...

Provisional attachment of goods - bogus invoices - writ court granted relief to the respondent - as on date, the respondent have not complied with the order passed by...

The AT dismissed the appeal against the provisional attachment order u/s 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 as not maintainable. An appeal lies against...

NCLAT addressed the computation of limitation periods for filing appeals under IBC. The tribunal held that while the 30-day limitation period under Section 61 can be...

Validity of provisional attachment order challenged - petitioner lawful owner of property - no notice issued violating natural justice principles - duty on Adjudicating...

Quick Updates: