Violation of the provisions of Sections 269SS and 269T - scope ...

Share Application Funds Not Considered Loans or Deposits; No Penalties u/ss 271D and 271E Apply.

May 16, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Violation of the provisions of Sections 269SS and 269T - scope of the term "loan" and "deposit" - Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - amount received on account of share application money and repayment - The High court observed that share application money is for participation in the capital of the company and is neither repayable after notice nor after a period. - The High court ruled that share application money does not constitute a loan or deposit as defined in the Act. Hence, the provisions of Sections 269SS and 269T do not apply, and no penalties under Sections 271D and 271E can be imposed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Violation of the provisions of Sections 269SS and 269T - scope ...

Share Application Funds Not Considered Loans or Deposits; No Penalties u/ss 271D and 271E Apply.

May 16, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee...

The case pertains to penalty proceedings u/s 271D for violating Section 269SS and Section 271E of the Income Tax Act. The assessee received Rs. 18 lakh from a trustee...

Penalty u/s 271D or 271E - Penalty u/s.271D or 271E of the Act is concerned, those are independent proceedings and having nothing to do with assessment proceedings or...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271D - treating the share application money as deposit u/s 269SS - once the A.O. has treated the share application money received by the assessee in...

Treatment of Share Application money as loans & Advances(269SS) - Penalty under 271D - Share application monies received by a company, pending allotment of shares, do...

Penalty invoking the provisions of section 271D - Managing Director of the assessee company had extended cash to the company - loan or deposits u/s 269SS - By invoking...

Penalty u/s. 271D - assessee has repaid loans/ deposits from various sister concerns through journal entries, i.e., otherwise than account payee cheques/draft - though...

The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

Penalty u/s 271D read with section 269SS and Penalty u/s 271E read with section 269D - cash transaction - Merely on the regular balance interest paid the transaction...

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Section 7 application filed by the Appellant, ruling that the share application money deposited by the Appellant with the Corporate...

AO initiated the penalty u/s 271E for violation of sec. 269TT, but levied penalty u/s 271D for violation of the provisions of sec. 269SS. From this conduct of the AO, it...

Penalty u/s 271D and penalty u/s. 271E - Default u/s 269SS and u/s 269T - Loan/deposits taken/paid by the assessee in cash is more than Rs.20,000/- - after evaluating...

ITAT quashed penalties under sections 271D and 271E for accepting cash loans of Rs. 17,00,000 in violation of section 269SS. Tribunal considered assessee's circumstances...

Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - allegation of cash loan having been taken/repaid - The ITAT underscored the principle that penalties under Sections 271D and 271E for...

Violate the provisions of section 269SS and 269T – share application money - penalty u/s 271D and 271E is not automatic - if there is bonafide belief, no penalty u/s...

Quick Updates: