Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2024 Year 2024 This

Clandestine removal case - Department failed to establish ...


Dept's clandestine mfg & removal claim falls flat - mere parts recovery insufficient, clinching evidence lacking.

Case Laws     Central Excise

October 19, 2024

Clandestine removal case - Department failed to establish clandestine manufacture and removal of assembled TV sets from warehouse/godown beyond reasonable doubt. Mere recovery of parts or TV sets insufficient, clinching corroborative evidence required. Statements alone cannot establish facts. Department tried to establish cash dealings to avoid buyer identity, but ledger showed banking transactions with buyer details. Consistent view that Settlement Commission findings cannot be basis for adjudication in different proceedings. As duty demand failed, interest and penalties also set aside. Extended period wrongly invoked as facts known to department in 2016 itself when DRI investigation started, show cause notice issued belatedly in 2020. Lack of evidence on manufacturing, transportation, buyers. Show cause notice unsustainable, appeal allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Clandestine removal - CENVAT credit Demand - Penalty - shortage of goods - Mere signing of the chart alleging removal of finished goods cannot be treated as clear...

  2. Clandestine removal - MS Ingots - the findings of clandestine removal cannot be upheld based upon the third party documents, unless there is clinching evidence of...

  3. Clandestine removal - evasion of duty - clearance of branded Khaini - burden to prove on Revenue - Ultimately, the High court concurred with the majority view of the...

  4. Clandestine removal - Shortage of raw material and finished goods - no verification at the buyer/supplier’s end conducted by the Revenue - mere payment of duty on the...

  5. Clandestine removal - demand based on the outward gate register as well as inward gate register - The allegation of clandestine removal cannot be upheld only on the...

  6. Clandestine Removal - documents seized by the investigating team from the residence of the Accountant - corroborative evidence or not - The charge of clandestine removal...

  7. Clandestine Removal - It is found that time and again it is held by the judicial pronouncements that merely on the basis of difference in the figures of audit report and...

  8. Clandestine Removal - clandestine removal is a serious charge and requires to be substantiated by evidence encompassing various activities in the chain of events. - The...

  9. 100% EOU - Clandestine removal - case of the department is on the ground that deemed export clearance were not genuine and were shown only on paper - The entire case of...

  10. Clandestine manufacture and removal - shortage of finished goods or not - There was no clandestine removal of goods against the seized Gate Passes, which are also not...

  11. Clandestine removal - suppression of production - Merely deposit of money at the time of investigation would not amount to acceptance of allegations of clandestine...

  12. Clandestine removal - on the basis of third party records - As Revenue has failed to produce any supporting evidence in their favour, therefore, the charge of...

  13. Clandestine removal - duty & penalty - shortages found during the physical stock carried out by the preventive Officers of the Department - shortage admitted and duty...

  14. Clandestine removal - penalty - The unquestioned documentary evidence would suffice to establish the clandestine removal and the handling of such goods by M/s Royal...

  15. Clandestine removal - penalty has rightly been imposed on the appellants for their collaborative role in the conspiracy of clandestine removal of goods by M/s HSAL and...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates