GST dispute involving misclassification of two-wheeler seats - ...

Two-wheeler seat GST dispute: Misclassification led to tax liability. Petitioner to forgo refund claim for Rs. 1.25 billion if notices split for AMNESTY scheme.

Case Laws GST

October 19, 2024

GST dispute involving misclassification of two-wheeler seats - petitioner challenged bunching of show cause notices for multiple assessment years - HC allowed splitting notices for separate years to avail proposed AMNESTY scheme - petitioner agreed not to claim refund of Rs. 1,24,74,14,950 deposited as tax liability and not raise limitation issue if separate notices issued - impugned show cause notice set aside - HC directed issuance of separate notices within two weeks for six assessment years to enable AMNESTY scheme benefit.

View Source

← Previous Next →

GST dispute involving misclassification of two-wheeler seats - ...

Two-wheeler seat GST dispute: Misclassification led to tax liability. Petitioner to forgo refund claim for Rs. 1.25 billion if notices split for AMNESTY scheme.

Case Laws GST

October 19, 2024

You may also like:

Classification of goods - rate of tax - Two wheeler seat covers - the Two wheeler seat covers are specifically covered under CTH 87149990 and are taxable (@ 14% CGST +...

This circular clarifies GST rates and classification for certain goods based on recommendations of the GST Council's 54th meeting. Key points: Extruded/expanded savoury...

The case pertains to the refund of tax paid by the petitioner under the 'Inverted Duty Structure' in the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime. The petitioner filed an...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

E-commerce operator's scope and GST liability u/s 9(5) of CGST Act, 2017 - Applicant qualifies as Electronic Commerce Operator (ECO) as it owns 'Rapido' app platform for...

Refund claim of amount paid under mistake of law - It is also noticed that it is a dispute between the appellant and the builder, two contracting parties. This dispute...

Refund amount recovered coercively - Despite paying 20% of the tax in dispute, the tax authorities issued a demand and forcibly recovered the full balance - GST...

Refund of Service Tax - time limitation - Exercise of power u/s 142(3) of GST Act for refund of service tax - The case involves the rejection of a refund claim by the...

TAX DEDUCTION AT SOURCE UNDER GST - Goods and Services Tax - GST

The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 aims to settle tax disputes. The term "appeal" under the Act includes writ petitions challenging tax orders, as per Supreme...

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

The appellant paid service tax voluntarily under reverse charge mechanism before the GST regime. The adjudicating authority denied refund, holding that service tax was...

Circular provides revised procedure for electronic filing and processing of refund applications by Canteen Stores Department (CSD) u/s 55 of CGST Act. CSD can...

Refund of service tax paid - Chit Fund Foreman Service - refund claimed as no service tax was chargeable - There has been a delay of more than two years - refund cannot be allowed.

Refund claim of service tax paid - classification of services - Claiming a refund of the amount paid as tax as per their understanding of law cannot be disputed now -...

Quick Updates: