Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2018 Year 2018 This

Unjust enrichment - provisional assessment - The procedure ...


Unjust Enrichment Procedure in Provisional Assessments Applies Only Post-1999 Due to Rule 9B's Non-Retrospective Effect.

May 9, 2018

Case Laws     Central Excise     HC

Unjust enrichment - provisional assessment - The procedure regarding unjust enrichment of finalization of provisional assessment will be applicable to the provisional assessment made after 1999 and not before that date as the proviso to Rule 9B in the form of sub Rule 5 did not have a retrospective effect. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Proviso to Rule 9B(5) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 regarding unjust enrichment not applicable retrospectively for finalization of provisional assessments prior to 1999....

  2. Refund – doctrine of unjust enrichment would not apply to fine and penalty - AT

  3. Refund claim - finalization of provisional assessment - unjust enrichment - captive consumption - even in respect of captive consumption, unjust enrichment provision is...

  4. CESTAT ruled that in provisional assessment cases, adjustments of excess duty payments against shortfalls must be handled comprehensively. The tribunal determined that...

  5. Refund of Excess Excise Duty - principles of unjust enrichment - the provisional assessment was directed in the year 1995 and relevant documents for finalisation of...

  6. Denial of refund claim - unjust enrichment clause shall not apply for finalization of the provisional assessment for the cases prior to 13.7.2006 - AT

  7. Refund of excess Excise duty paid - unjust enrichment - finalization of provisional assessment - adjustments at the time of finalization of provisional assessments would...

  8. The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

  9. Excess duty paid due to issuance of credit notes to dealers and stockists after clearance of goods was rejected on grounds of incidence being passed on and lack of...

  10. Refund - Applicability of doctrine of unjust enrichment - Revenue cannot pick and choose the assessment years for challenging the orders having similar effect. Moreover,...

  11. Rejection of refund claim - finalization of provisional assessment or not - A provisional assessment will always remain as a provisional one. There is no shortcut as a...

  12. Refund - amount paid by the appellant under protest - the principal unjust enrichment does not apply to cases where duty has been paid to protest - unjust enrichment...

  13. The appellant sought refund of countervailing duty (CVD) paid while importing goods declared as 'Natural gum in raw form' through Bills of Entry filed during 2011-2014....

  14. Remission of Central Excise Duty - The tribunal found Rule 21 inapplicable, as it pertains to goods lost or destroyed before clearance from the factory, not to loss of...

  15. Refund claim - unjust enrichment - inalization of provisional assessment - Merely because those applications for claim of refund were made prior to 13.07.2006, it cannot...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates