The High Court addressed the violation of principles of natural ...

Faulty service of order quashed, pay 25% tax; file objections after hearing.

Case Laws GST

November 8, 2024

The High Court addressed the violation of principles of natural justice. The impugned order of assessment was not properly served on the petitioner, as it was merely uploaded on the common portal instead of being tendered or sent via RPAD. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside. The petitioner was directed to deposit 25% of the disputed tax within two weeks from receiving the order's copy. Upon complying, the impugned assessment order shall be treated as a show cause notice. The petitioner must submit objections within four weeks from receiving the order's copy, along with supporting documents. If objections are filed, the respondent shall consider them and pass orders in accordance with law after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court addressed the violation of principles of natural ...

Faulty service of order quashed, pay 25% tax; file objections after hearing.

Case Laws GST

November 8, 2024

You may also like:

Validity of assessment order - Section 25(1) of KVAT Act - when issues of re-assessment are fairly complex and the financial implication resulting from the proposed...

The ITAT Delhi held that denial of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) claim due to late filing of Form 67 after the due date of filing Income Tax Return (ITR) was not justified....

Principles of natural justice violated due to improper service of show cause notice (SCN). SCN and impugned order uploaded on GST portal, but mismatch between GSTR-7 and...

Eligibility to make adjustment of excess service tax paid against future service tax liability - Claim of Excess service tax paid due to issuance of revised invoice -...

Right of department to file any appeal or cross-objections before the Commissioner (Appeals) against Refund order - the Department could neither have filed an appeal...

The petitioner challenged orders u/s 62 of the TNGST Act for failing to furnish returns from April to July 2023 within the prescribed period. The High Court held that...

ITC availed in excess of credit reflected in GSTR-2A, mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A, ITC not reversed based on GSTR-2A debit, non-generation of e-way bill....

RATES OF INCOME-TAX for the PY 2022-23 i.e. AY 2023-24 [As per previous year Budget and comparison with Budget 2023 proposals] - Notes In the new tax regime increase the...

Appeal before CIT(A) - Non deposit of admitted tax/advance tax as provided u/s 249(4) - Payment of tax is mandatory but the requirement of paying such tax before filing...

Works Contract Services - Service Tax registration not taken - service tax not paid - while confirming the demand of service tax for the extended period of limitation,...

Withdrawal of CIRP Application filed u/s 12 A of IBC - settlement between the Appellants and the Corporate Debtor - On the day when the Application was filed, there was...

Jurisdiction - rights of Adjudicating Authority to hear Objectors/ Interveners, before admission of the Application - The Scheme under Chapter III-A and the Regulations...

Option to pay 25% of the service tax towards penalty under Section 78 - assessee given an option to pay 25% of the service tax towards penalty under Section 78 of...

Benefit of the scheme under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 denied - delayed payment of just 25% of the amount - prima facie, we are of the considered opinion that...

Validity of assessment order u/s 25(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - suppression of turnover - evasion of tax - The court held that the petitioner did not...

Quick Updates: