Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court held that the denial by the respondents to apply ...


Tax Penalty Order Remanded: Court Rejects Denial Based on Clarification, Seeks Fresh Order.

November 8, 2024

Case Laws     GST     HC

The High Court held that the denial by the respondents to apply Section 129(1)(a) of the CGST/IGST Act based on the clarification dated 31.12.2018 and previous judgments was unjustified. The finding of the authority in Para-4 of its order was essentially factual and solely based on communication from CGST, Delhi regarding initiation of cancellation proceedings, without any evidence on record. The GSTIN status produced by the petitioner indicated a different status from what was claimed by the Delhi authority. Consequently, the impugned demand of penalty order dated 27.09.2024 passed by Respondent No.2 was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the competent authority to pass a fresh order. The writ petition was allowed by way of remand.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refusal to rectify the assessment order passed under Rule 142 (5) of the C.G.S.T. Rules, 2017 - denial of the Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The High Court found merit in the...

  2. Validity of fresh assessment orders - HC quashed the assessment order invoking the writ jurisdiction - othing has been observed by the High Court on the merits of the...

  3. Clarification on issue of GST rate on alcohol based hand sanitizers - News

  4. The petitioners' belated input tax credit denial u/s 16(4) of GST Acts overturned by High Court. Orders set aside, cases remitted to Assessing Officer for fresh decision...

  5. The High Court held that the Assessing Officer is not restricted from issuing a fresh notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, even after filing of earlier reassessment...

  6. This summary concerns the maintainability of a fresh application u/s 94 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The appellant had filed an application u/s 94 in 2020,...

  7. Validity of order of Lok Adalat based on mutual compromise - High court set aside the order of Lok Adalat -Suit for partition and separate possession of property - The...

  8. Re-opening of Assessment – Fixation of tax rate at 16% against 10% –Revenue was not justified in demanding tax at 16% by seeking to reopen concluded assessments by...

  9. Amnesty Scheme - SVLDRS - CENVAT Credit on input services - In fact, in order to ensure that the Designated Committee does not dispute the tax through input credit, a...

  10. KVAT - The clarification issued u/s 59 is different from the clarification or advanced ruling given u/s 60. In the latter case, the ruling of the authority would be...

  11. The appeals challenged the approval of Sarda Energy and Minerals Ltd.'s Resolution Plan, alleging material irregularities by the Resolution Professional (RP) and...

  12. Valuation - Sale of vehicles - Demand of differential amount of token tax/fees of the vehicles sold - Any clarification issued by the department to a notification cannot...

  13. Clarification in respect of residency under section 6 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Circular

  14. Clarification on provisions of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 - Circular

  15. Implementation of decision to expedite pending refund claims - Clarifications / Instructions / Orders

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates