The petitioner was directed to pay a 5% penalty of the ...

Project Delay Penalty Quashed: Court Sides with Firm for Timely Production Commencement.

Case Laws GST

November 9, 2024

The petitioner was directed to pay a 5% penalty of the prevailing plot cost for the belated implementation of the project as per Clause 2.1.2.(a) of O.O.No.30 of 2020. However, the petitioner complied with the clause by utilizing more than 65% of the plot and had commenced production before dispatching goods. Despite paying the penalty amount, the petitioner was again directed to pay a 5% penalty. The Court found infirmity and illegality in the impugned order and quashed it, allowing the petition, as the petitioner had already paid the penalty and commenced production before dispatching goods, complying with all conditions.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The petitioner was directed to pay a 5% penalty of the ...

Project Delay Penalty Quashed: Court Sides with Firm for Timely Production Commencement.

Case Laws GST

November 9, 2024

You may also like:

Area Based exemption - Balaji has not started the commercial production by March 31, 2010 and the condition of the Notification is “commencement of commercial...

The RERA lacks jurisdiction over projects completed before its enactment. The project obtained Occupation/Completion Certificate prior to RERA's commencement, rendering...

Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee...

Penalty u/s 271D - assessee is a small trader - household expenses incurred and paid from firm have been entered in cash book debited to assessee's a/c and crediting the...

Demanding duty from the firm and penalties were imposed on the firm & partner both - The appeal filed by the firm cannot be considered as joint appeal - AT

Condonation of delay - substantial delay of 166 days before ITAT - The appellant argued that the delay in filing the appeal before the ITAT was due to the absence of...

Penalty u/s 271C – reasonable cause - The assessees are partners in a firm – Both the assessees has paid interest to firm without deducting tax at source - No penalty - AT

Tribunal found assessee had reasonable cause for delay in furnishing Tax Audit Report due to delay in finalization of statutory audit arising from dispute between Board...

The Bombay High Court addressed non-compliance with Rule 28 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 regarding timely registration and disposal of applications u/s 94 and 95 of the...

Benefit of reduced penalty of 15% u/s 28(5) - Delay in payment of penalty due to Public Holiday - The appellant voluntarily paid the differential BCD and interest upon...

Promotion of investments by providing structured packages for eligible projects - In the present case, the fact that the petitioner has failed to achieve the requisite...

Project is falling under "other than On-going Projects" - New project or not - The Notification No. 03/2019 makes a distinction between ‘Ongoing project’ in clause (xx)...

Exemption under Notification 108/95 is not available to the project financed by JBIC but demand beyond the period of one year from the date of show-cause notice are not...

Condonation of delay in re-filing appeals by revenue rejected - Delay of three years - Delays by government departments due to impersonal official machinery not accepted...

Misclassification and Wrongful Claim of MEIS Benefits - Exports of quilts containing cotton/polyester - Levy of penalties - The CESTAT found the appellant guilty of...

Quick Updates: