Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2024 Year 2024 This

In the case of 2024 (5) TMI 1099 before ITAT Mumbai, the issue ...


Reassessment Order validity questioned due to CIT(A) errors. AO appeal allowed due to lack of independent decision by CIT(A).

Case Laws     Income Tax

May 23, 2024

In the case of 2024 (5) TMI 1099 before ITAT Mumbai, the issue was the validity of a reassessment order. The CIT (A) passed an order that contained different grounds than those raised by the assessee, indicating a lack of independent application of mind. The assessment order referred to in the caption did not match the one in the body of the order. The facts in the assessment order differed from those mentioned by the CIT (A). The grounds of appeal were also different between what the assessee submitted and what the CIT (A) included in the order. The ITAT found the CIT (A) had engaged in a 'cut & paste' exercise without proper consideration, leading to an unsustainable and perverse order. Consequently, the ITAT allowed all grounds of appeal, directing the CIT (A) to reconsider the case based on the actual facts and provide the assessee with a fair hearing. The appeal of the AO was allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Recovery of dues from PSU - Seeking directions for payment of the dues of the company which was deposited as security deposit, along with interest - The question as to...

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

  3. The ITAT Kolkata examined the validity of reassessment proceedings based on "reasons to believe" u/s 147. The AO's reasons lacked independent application of mind, being...

  4. Validity of policy decision - Imposing prohibition on export of Shark fins of all species of Shark - The rationality of the decision cannot be adjudged on a proof of...

  5. Appointment of Additional Director or independent Director - incorrect declaration in the aforesaid Form DIR-12 or not - The subsequent documents along with the...

  6. The High Court rejected the appeal filed by the applicant due to lack of reasons for enhancing turnover, non-consideration of material evidence, and failure to obtain...

  7. Adjudication of a customs duty dispute involving the import of cars and the determination of the 'transaction value' u/s 14 of the Customs Act, 1962. The key points are:...

  8. The High Court revisited the reopening of assessment u/s 147 due to the assessee's involvement in penny share transactions. The petitioner invested in shares through IPO...

  9. The Delhi High Court examined the validity of assessments u/s 153A and whether the specified authority granted approval in accordance with Section 153D. The court...

  10. The Appellant sought payment of its pre-CIRP dues from the Respondent in a manner different from the approved resolution plan, which provided for payment of pre-CIRP...

  11. The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

  12. Jurisdiction of civil court u/s 34 of SARFAESI Act was in question. Suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction was rejected by lower courts under Order...

  13. Notices issued u/s 148 by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) were held invalid due to lack of jurisdiction, as per Section 151A...

  14. Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

  15. TDS returns - Due dates - Rule 31A prescribing due dates for furnishing TDS statements amended

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates