Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

CIT(A) restricted addition on account of accommodation entries ...


Tribunal Upholds Reduced Tax Additions and Deductions, Dismisses Revenue's Claims Due to Insufficient Evidence.

November 20, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

CIT(A) restricted addition on account of accommodation entries to 15% instead of 100%, as the Assessing Officer failed to establish that work was not actually performed. The Tribunal concurred with CIT(A)'s disallowance rate of 15% and rejected Revenue's contention to restore 100% disallowance. Regarding commission expenses of INR 8,81,3000/-, the Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s deletion in the absence of material to substantiate the allegation of 1% commission payment. CIT(A) correctly allowed the claim of deduction u/s 80-IA based on the Assessing Officer's remand report. Concerning disallowance u/s 14A, the Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s findings as the assessee had suo moto disallowed a higher amount of 1% of average investment as administrative expenses compared to the Assessing Officer's disallowance of 0.5%. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's grounds on all issues.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered whether an assessee can claim deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the first time in the return...

  2. The assessee, a company engaged in development/construction and sale of flats and plots, had classified its properties into four categories: flats open for sale, let-out...

  3. The Appellate Tribunal considered two main issues: 1. Addition u/s 37(1) - Assessee incurred business loss due to default in property payment, allowed as revenue loss. 2....

  4. Assessee followed joint venture model for sharing revenue with collaborators as per franchise agreement. Assessee recorded all revenues, incurred expenditure, and shared...

  5. Denial of deduction claimed under Chapter VI-A i.e. Section 80G/ 80GGA read with Section 35AC - The Appellate Tribunal noted that the appellant had not claimed the...

  6. Deduction u/s 80IA(4) - Disallowance of project facility expenses - Revenue expenses or Capital expenditure - Appellant was engaged in infrastructure development and...

  7. ITAT ruled in favor of assessee regarding GST disallowance u/s 43B. The tribunal found that GST amount was not routed through Profit & Loss account but shown under...

  8. The ITAT addressed various issues including disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D, where Revenue challenged deletion of disallowance made by AO. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision,...

  9. The ITAT held that where the assessee entered into a unilateral Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) with the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and complied with its...

  10. The assessee received cash credits which were treated as unexplained income u/s 68 by the Assessing Officer (AO). However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)...

  11. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of classifying imported Zinc as unwrought/unrefined under a specific customs tariff heading. The Tribunal rejected the demand...

  12. The ITAT held that the order passed u/s 263 by the PCIT was in gross violation of the principles of natural justice. The Tribunal observed that the order disregarded the...

  13. The ITAT Hyderabad upheld the estimation of income and profit, dismissing Revenue's appeal. The profit was modified to 11.5%. Deduction u/s 80-IA(4) was disallowed based...

  14. The ITAT Pune dealt with a case involving denial of standard deduction and Chapter VIA deductions u/s 80C. The appellant, an individual earning income under the head...

  15. Denial of deduction u/s. 10(23C) - Despite the filing of Form 10B during the appellate proceedings, the Tribunal ruled that the primary requirement for claiming...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates