The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal against the reopening of ...

Income tax reassessment beyond 4-year period invalid; no failure by assessee to disclose material facts.

December 2, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal against the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the four-year period. The Assessing Officer failed to record a finding that the escapement of income was attributable to the assessee's failure to fully and truly disclose material facts. The Tribunal held that since the assessee had disclosed all facts in the return filed u/s 139(1) and the case was scrutinized u/s 143(3), the reopening beyond four years without establishing the assessee's failure to disclose material facts rendered the reassessment proceedings nullity, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in CEAT Ltd.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal against the reopening of ...

Income tax reassessment beyond 4-year period invalid; no failure by assessee to disclose material facts.

December 2, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment after four years and the addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act. It held that the original assessment was...

The High Court held that the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Revenue were invalid due to the absence of any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose...

Penalty u/s.271AAB - Belated filing of regular return after search - Penalty cannot be levied u/s.271AAB of the Act, in respect of income disclosed in regular return of...

The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

The High Court held that the reassessment order dated 12.05.2023 and subsequent proceedings were invalid as they were beyond the statutory limitation period prescribed...

The High Court quashed the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 and the consequent initiation of reassessment proceedings, ruling in favor of the assessee. The key points...

Penalty order u/s 271AAB for treating an amount included in the Return of Income as 'undisclosed income' was found unjustified. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)...

Charging interest u/s. 234B(3) / (4) - The section 234B(4) states that if there is any increase or decrease in the income, correspondingly interest shall be increased or...

Reassessment u/s 148 - exemption u/s 10AA - assessment completed u/s 143(3) reopened after expiry of 4 years - Revenue could not place any material to establish that...

Assessment completed u/s 143(3) accepting assessee's return, which included export incentive and foreign exchange fluctuation as other business income. Subsequently,...

The ITAT Nagpur considered the validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 147. The AO issued notice beyond four years alleging capital gain on "Sale of Vehicles" escaped...

The summary highlights the key difference between the scope of total income under the Income Tax Act and the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and...

Reopening of assessment after expiry of four years due to deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) was found invalid. The Assessing Officer (AO) failed to establish that the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s 148 - No difference between returned income and assessed income - Assessee voluntarily...

Income tax liability of employees - Remission of income tax liability borne on behalf of the employees - it is also possible that earlier years the assessee has not...

Quick Updates: