Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2024 Year 2024 This

Reopening of assessment after expiry of four years due to deemed ...


Reopening beyond 4 yrs invalid due to lack of evidence of non-disclosure. Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) not required to be declared.

Case Laws     Income Tax

July 22, 2024

Reopening of assessment after expiry of four years due to deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) was found invalid. The Assessing Officer (AO) failed to establish that the assessee did not disclose fully and truly all material facts, which is a prerequisite for reopening beyond four years. There was no requirement to declare deemed dividend in the return of income or tax audit report for that year. The assessee's account with the company was in the nature of a current account with multiple transactions. The CIT(A) incorrectly considered only the closing credit balance as deemed dividend. The AO did not correctly assume jurisdiction u/s 147 as the assessee's failure to disclose material facts was neither brought out by the AO nor evident from the record. Therefore, the reopening was incorrect and not in accordance with the first proviso to Section 147, and the decision was in favor of the assessee.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The High Court addressed the issue of reopening assessment due to disallowance of depreciation and reduced returned loss. The notice was issued after the 4-year period,...

  2. Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

  3. Customs broker's license revocation order set aside due to lack of evidence for alleged violations. Key findings: no proof of misdeclaration or undervaluation to...

  4. Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - oan or advance to a non-shareholder cannot be taxed as deemed dividend in the hands of the a non shareholder - AT

  5. Reassessment - Whatever the validity of the AO's contention regarding such dividend, surely, he cannot reopen the assessment beyond the period of 4 years from the end of...

  6. Deemed Dividend - addition of advance salary as deemed dividend - advance was not in the nature of loan and hence cannot be treated as deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - AT

  7. Processing of invalid return u/s 143(1) - Denial of exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) - non-filing of ITR-V within 120 days made the assessee’s return as ‘invalid’ being...

  8. AO reopened assessment on basis of difference between market value and registration value of property, assuming petitioner was owner. Petitioner argued section 50C...

  9. Reopening of assessment after four years is invalid as the recorded reasons do not mention any failure by the assessee to fully and truly disclose all material facts...

  10. Application of Dividend Distribution Tax to Deemed Dividend

  11. Deemed dividend addition u/s 2(22)(e) - Since all the conditions necessary for treating the deemed dividend of the amount received in the hands of concern (which in this...

  12. Deemed dividend u/s. 2(22)(e) - the loan given by the company only in the immediate preceding year, i.e., assessment year 2007-08, should be assessed as deemed dividend...

  13. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - deemed dividend addition u/s 2(22)(e) - gap of more than four years - when the amount received by the two concerns from the loan giver...

  14. Validity of reopening of assessment - Approval of PCIT u/s 151 - The Tribunal acknowledged the Assessee's argument regarding the mechanical approval granted by the PCIT....

  15. Reopening of completed assessment u/s 143(3) after 4 years - though the ld.AO has to form a prima facie belief only, but has not analysed any of these details while...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates