The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order regarding three additions ...

Tribunal upholds tax authority's order on booking advance, deletes overstatement of purchases & unexplained expenditure.

December 7, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order regarding three additions made by the Assessing Officer. Firstly, the receipt treated as consultancy income was rightly held to be a booking advance by the CIT(A) as no evidence of consultancy services was found and no TDS was deducted. Secondly, the addition for overstatement of purchases was correctly deleted by the CIT(A) after considering the assessee's explanation and finding no disparity between book data and sundry creditor details. Thirdly, the CIT(A)'s deletion of addition for unexplained expenditure was upheld as the chart for loan repayments through banking channels was based on bank statements filed during assessment, and the Revenue failed to controvert these factual findings.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order regarding three additions ...

Tribunal upholds tax authority's order on booking advance, deletes overstatement of purchases & unexplained expenditure.

December 7, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal u/s 249(4)(b) due to non-payment of advance tax. The assessee did not respond to the notice u/s 142(1) to clarify tax payment....

The CIT(A) partly allowed and restricted the addition on account of commission expenses at 0.25% as compared to 2% adopted by the Assessing Officer. The coordinate bench...

The Supreme Court interpreted the definition of "purchase price" u/s 2(18) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (GVAT Act). It held that purchases on which value...

Service tax on sale and purchase of flats – constitutional validity upheld by HC

Disallowance of interest u/s 36(1)(iii) - Advance given to Individual for purchase of property - The CIT(A) found that the advance was for purchasing a property intended...

The case pertains to the levy of interest u/s 234C for failure on the part of the payer to deduct tax deducted at source (TDS) u/ss 196D and 194LD. The key points are:...

Sections 132B, 140A, 153A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were analyzed regarding adjustment of seized cash against tax liability. The appellants claimed that cash...

The ITAT held that where the assessee entered into a unilateral Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) with the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and complied with its...

ITAT dealt with the addition of notional interest on interest-free advances and disallowance of inflated import purchases. Assessee's advances to brokers were assigned...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

Interest u/s 234C - interest for deferment of advance tax - If on a particular due date for payment of advance tax, the facts show that there is no liability to pay...

The assessee received cash credits which were treated as unexplained income u/s 68 by the Assessing Officer (AO). However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)...

Income assessed in hands of Appellant as Representative Assessee. No credit for prepaid taxes availed by beneficiaries. JCIT(A) directed AO to verify claim of prepaid...

Unexplained cash credit addition rightly deleted as amount credited in sales account and offered as income. Non-genuine purchases addition rightly deleted based on...

Advance tax payment obligation does not apply when assessee claims agricultural land sale proceeds are exempt u/s 2(14). CIT(Appeals) should admit appeal for...

Quick Updates: