The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the department's ...

Penalty cancelled for non-maintenance of docs related to intl transactions as assessee had only domestic transactions.

December 13, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the department's appeal against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order cancelling the penalty u/s 271AA imposed on the assessee for non-maintenance of documents relating to international transactions. The Tribunal observed that the assessee did not have any international transaction during the relevant year, but only had domestic transactions with an associated enterprise. The Tax Audit Report and purchase ledger extracts confirmed the assessee's purchases were from a domestic company, not a foreign enterprise as alleged. The Tribunal also noted that the provisions related to specified domestic transactions u/s 92BA were not applicable to the assessee for the relevant assessment year after the omission of Section 40A(2)(b) by the Finance Act, 2017. Consequently, the penalty imposed u/s 271AA was not sustainable.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the department's ...

Penalty cancelled for non-maintenance of docs related to intl transactions as assessee had only domestic transactions.

December 13, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

TP Adjustment - US Transactions non US Transactions - scope of MAP agreement - It would be better to refer to the settlement arrived between the competent authority of...

Tax deduction at source (TDS) u/s 194IA is applicable on the payment made for purchase of immovable property, not on the stamp duty valuation. The provision mandating...

Capital gains - treating information contained in ITS as related to transaction of sale of immovable property - Assessee had pointed out how the two transactions...

Penalty u/s 271G - requirement of maintenance of segment profitability between AEs and non-AEs transactions - non-maintenance of details in terms of section 92D(3) of IT...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Penalty u/s. 271G - assessee did not provide any basis for comparing the transactions and it failed to provide any alternative method to benchmark the transactions which...

Duty drawback recovery case involving merchant exporter manufacturing DOC using duty-paid Hexane. Petitioner did not issue ARE-2 while removing DOC, but Commissioner...

Revision u/s 263 - disallowance of expenses - AO had after deliberating at length arrived at a plausible view i.e., allowing of the assessee’s claim for deduction of...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled that non-deduction of TDS on directors' fees and transaction charges u/s 194J was not liable for penalty u/s 271C. It accepted...

Penalty u/s 271AA - failure to make disclosures, as required u/s 92E - as to whether SPMCECL was a related party is an issue qua which there can possibly be more than...

CIRP - Preferential Transactions or not - related transaction or not - Transaction within look bak period - such transactions are carried with intent to defraud...

Various Service tax issues related to different activities undertaken by the appellant. The key points are: service tax demand on operation and maintenance of ropeway...

The case pertains to penalty proceedings u/s 271D for violating Section 269SS and Section 271E of the Income Tax Act. The assessee received Rs. 18 lakh from a trustee...

Transaction value - Valuation (Customs) - Special or abnormal discount to the related buyers which were in excess of 3% discount - The Appellate Tribunal observed that...

Penalty u/s 271D or 271E - Penalty u/s.271D or 271E of the Act is concerned, those are independent proceedings and having nothing to do with assessment proceedings or...

Quick Updates: