Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2024 Year 2024 This

Penalty proceedings u/s 271D, 271E and 271AAA - period of ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

January 9, 2024

Penalty proceedings u/s 271D, 271E and 271AAA - period of limitation - the period of six months from the end of the month in which action for imposition of penalty was initiated ended on 30.06.2011. - Concededly, the penalty order was passed way beyond the later date i.e., 30.06.2011. The record discloses that the penalty order was passed on 30.12.2011. - No penalty - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Period of limitation for levy of penalty - Penalty proceedings u/s 271D - penalty order, was passed beyond the time period prescribed by Section 275(1)(c) - the same...

  2. Penalty u/s 271D or 271E - Penalty u/s.271D or 271E of the Act is concerned, those are independent proceedings and having nothing to do with assessment proceedings or...

  3. Levy of penalties u/s 271D and 271E for the violation of sections 269SS and 269T, respectively - The Tribunal, after reviewing precedents from the Supreme Court and...

  4. Levy of penalty u/s 271C - Period of limitation - In the present case, since penalty u/s 271C has not been initiated during the course of any proceedings, first part of...

  5. Penalty u/s.271D & 271E - Period of limitation for imposing penalty u/s 275(1)(c) - he discussion by the AO in the assessment order and making reference to the Addl. CIT...

  6. Determination of normal period of limitation - Extension of period from 18 months to 30 months - The amendment will not put life into dead cases but those which are...

  7. Penalty u/s 271E - violation u/s 269T - Section 275(1)(c) which would govern the present contest - statutory authority concerned, is restrained from passing any order of...

  8. The key points are regarding the penalty imposed u/s 271D read with Section 269SS, and the issue of whether the penalty orders were time-barred. The Assessing Officer...

  9. Assessment against an entity that had ceased to exist prior to the initiation of proceedings. The effect of a change in name was considered a curable defect u/s 292B, as...

  10. Period of limitation for passing the penalty order u/s 275(1)(a) - the limitation period for the levy of penalty will be as provided for under s. 275(1)(a), i.e., six...

  11. Penalty u/s 271D / 271E - violation of provisions of Sec.269SS and 269T - basis of presumption u/s 132(4A) - Period of limitation - The Tribunal found that the penalty...

  12. Penalty u/s 271D for violation of provisions of section 269SS - Even if it is assumed that the assessing officer has issued a notice u/s 271D on the date of assessment...

  13. Penalty u/s 271C - period of limitation to issue notice - A careful perusal of the second limb would show that the legislature has provided a limitation of six months,...

  14. The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

  15. The ITAT held that for penalty u/s 271D for contravention of section 269SS, recording satisfaction by AO is mandatory. Citing Jaya Laxmi Rice Mills case, it emphasized...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates