The HC set aside the impugned order dated 9 March 2009 passed by ...

Enforcement action quashed due to delay, remanded for fresh hearing within 3 months.

December 26, 2024

Case Laws FEMA HC

The HC set aside the impugned order dated 9 March 2009 passed by the Special Director (Enforcement) due to inordinate and unexplained delay between the conclusion of arguments and pronouncement of the order. The matter was remanded to the Special Director (Enforcement) to dispose of the show cause notices issued against the appellants expeditiously after providing them a hearing and passing reasoned orders within a reasonable period, preferably within three months from the conclusion of the hearing as per the guidelines laid down in Ramdular Singh vs. State of UP. The appellants were directed to appear before the Special Director on 2 January 2025 to set a schedule for the hearing.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The HC set aside the impugned order dated 9 March 2009 passed by ...

Enforcement action quashed due to delay, remanded for fresh hearing within 3 months.

December 26, 2024

Case Laws FEMA HC

You may also like:

The High Court quashed refund rejection orders for lack of opportunity for personal hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017, violating principles of...

The High Court held that the delay in issuing the tax refund was subject to the strict limitation period prescribed u/s 254 read with Section 153(3). The Assessing...

Condonation of delay in filing the Income tax returns on the specified due date u/s 119(2)(b) - As per petitioner due to covid-19 pandemic and due to change of Auditors,...

Delayed adjudication of show cause notice without reasonable cause - Delay in finalizing assessments and issuing demand - Classification of goods under appropriate...

Non-payment of interest on refund u/s 18(4) of the Customs Act 1962 upon finalization of provisional assessment was challenged. Upon completion of the specified import...

The appeal was initially rejected on the ground of limitation due to the non-availability of a self-attested copy of the order within the stipulated time frame as per...

Sub-section (3) of Section 15 of applicable GST statutes provides for reduction in value of supply on account of discount, if recorded in invoice or established by...

Appeal rejected on the ground of delay - Refund of unutilised input tax credit - The Court examined the interpretation of Rule 108(3) of the CGST Rules, which mandated...

Petitioner failed to authorize representative for GST matters after registration under GST regime, resulting in show cause notice being served on auditor without...

Validity of assessment order and bank attachment notice - no personal hearing provided - The High court notes that the petitioner was not heard before the order issuance...

Condonation of delay in filing an appeal - Commissioner (Appeals) has vested discretionary power to condone delay beyond first 3 months if appeal is within next 3 months. - AT

Refund of double tax paid by petitioner along with interest for November and December 2020 sought. Non-filing of GSTR-3B from July to December 2020. Petitioner to claim...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - cancellation of the GSTIN registration of the petitioner - It is true that the petitioner has not filed any application for...

HC dismissed petitioner's appeal challenging cancellation of GST registration. Petitioner filed appeal after 17 months delay, beyond 3-month limitation u/s 107 CGST Act....

Principles of natural justice - Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - The petitioner argued that it had already declared and paid taxes on the...

Quick Updates: