The HC set aside the impugned order dated 9 March 2009 passed by ...

Enforcement action quashed due to delay, remanded for fresh hearing within 3 months.

December 26, 2024

Case Laws FEMA HC

The HC set aside the impugned order dated 9 March 2009 passed by the Special Director (Enforcement) due to inordinate and unexplained delay between the conclusion of arguments and pronouncement of the order. The matter was remanded to the Special Director (Enforcement) to dispose of the show cause notices issued against the appellants expeditiously after providing them a hearing and passing reasoned orders within a reasonable period, preferably within three months from the conclusion of the hearing as per the guidelines laid down in Ramdular Singh vs. State of UP. The appellants were directed to appear before the Special Director on 2 January 2025 to set a schedule for the hearing.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The HC set aside the impugned order dated 9 March 2009 passed by ...

Enforcement action quashed due to delay, remanded for fresh hearing within 3 months.

December 26, 2024

Case Laws FEMA HC

You may also like:

The High Court quashed refund rejection orders for lack of opportunity for personal hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017, violating principles of...

Condonation of delay in filing the Income tax returns on the specified due date u/s 119(2)(b) - As per petitioner due to covid-19 pandemic and due to change of Auditors,...

The High Court held that the delay in issuing the tax refund was subject to the strict limitation period prescribed u/s 254 read with Section 153(3). The Assessing...

Delayed adjudication of show cause notice without reasonable cause - Delay in finalizing assessments and issuing demand - Classification of goods under appropriate...

The HC quashed the order cancelling petitioner's GST registration for failure to file returns for six months. The Court found that authorities failed to consider the...

Non-payment of interest on refund u/s 18(4) of the Customs Act 1962 upon finalization of provisional assessment was challenged. Upon completion of the specified import...

HC allowed petition challenging appellate order under Section 107 of 2017 Act, finding that Appellate Authority failed to judiciously exercise discretionary power...

The appeal was initially rejected on the ground of limitation due to the non-availability of a self-attested copy of the order within the stipulated time frame as per...

Sub-section (3) of Section 15 of applicable GST statutes provides for reduction in value of supply on account of discount, if recorded in invoice or established by...

Appeal rejected on the ground of delay - Refund of unutilised input tax credit - The Court examined the interpretation of Rule 108(3) of the CGST Rules, which mandated...

Petitioner failed to authorize representative for GST matters after registration under GST regime, resulting in show cause notice being served on auditor without...

Validity of assessment order and bank attachment notice - no personal hearing provided - The High court notes that the petitioner was not heard before the order issuance...

Condonation of delay in filing an appeal - Commissioner (Appeals) has vested discretionary power to condone delay beyond first 3 months if appeal is within next 3 months. - AT

HC condoned delay in filing appeal by small partnership firm, setting aside appellate authority's rejection. Court found appellate authority erroneously limited...

HC quashed assessment order and order in Form GST DRC-07 for violation of principles of natural justice by not granting personal hearing. Matter remitted to Assessing...

Quick Updates: