HC held that respondent Corporation cannot demand GST from ...

Penalty imposed by corporation for violating guidelines not subject to GST, rules Supreme Court.

January 7, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

HC held that respondent Corporation cannot demand GST from petitioners on penalty imposed for non-attendance of leakage complaint as there was no "supply of goods/services" by Corporation to petitioners. To demand GST, it must be proved that there is "supply of goods/services" by person collecting tax to person from whom tax is recovered. Here, no service was supplied by Corporation to petitioners while imposing penalty. Amounts sought were not for tolerating an act but for not following terms of agreement/guidelines framed by Corporation as deterrent against future breach. Petition dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC held that respondent Corporation cannot demand GST from ...

Penalty imposed by corporation for violating guidelines not subject to GST, rules Supreme Court.

January 7, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Levy of GST on the penalty levied in the disciplinary proceedings - the penalty imposed, under Rule 7(b) (xiv) of the Code in a disciplinary proceedings initiated...

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

Levy of penalty - Applicability of the substituted rule for imposition of penalty - The Supreme Court sided with the appellant, holding that the substituted rule from...

Levy of penalty on Proprietor of the Firm under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - Taking note of the fact that penalty...

Securities Contracts (Regulation) (Procedure for Holding Inquiry and Imposing Penalties by Adjudicating Officer) (Amendment) Rules, 2019

Depositories (Procedure for Holding Inquiry and Imposing Penalties by Adjudicating Officer) (Amendment) Rules, 2019

Section 12(1)(b) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 requires reporting entities to furnish information about transactions referred to in Section 12(1)(a) to...

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

CBEC releases Draft Rules and Formats - Draft GST Registration Rules, GST Payment Rules and GST Invoice Rules with formats

Penalty u/r 25 or 26 of CER - Mentioning wrong rule number - The first appellate authority was not correct in holding that mentioning Rule 25 was a typographical error...

The High Court held that prosecution u/ss 276C, 277, 278B, and 278E for tax evasion was invalid as it violated CBDT guidelines. Prosecution was premature without the...

This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

Supplementary refund of unutilized input tax credit pertaining to Compensatory Cess - Section 164 of the GST Act empowers the Government to frame rules. Refund of...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Clandestine removal of excisable goods - Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 imposed on Managing Director. Appellant challenged Order upholding penalty without...

Quick Updates: