CESTAT held that appellant-importer is liable to pay interest ...

Appellant liable for interest on delayed SAD, penalties set aside.

January 9, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

CESTAT held that appellant-importer is liable to pay interest for delayed payment of SAD u/s 28AB of Customs Act, 1962. However, penalties imposed on appellant-importer u/ss 114A and 114AA, and on CHA u/s 112(a)(ii) were set aside as conditions for invoking these provisions were not met. Confiscation of imported goods was denied as goods were cleared after due permission. Proceedings against company officials were rightly dropped by adjudicating authority. Interest already paid by appellant-importer to be appropriated against interest liability. Appeals disposed of accordingly.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT held that appellant-importer is liable to pay interest ...

Appellant liable for interest on delayed SAD, penalties set aside.

January 9, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Benefit of reduced penalty of 15% u/s 28(5) - Delay in payment of penalty due to Public Holiday - The appellant voluntarily paid the differential BCD and interest upon...

Recovery of erroneous Refund of interest on delayed payment of differential duty - price variation clause - Rejection on the ground that since the appellant was liable...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

Evidences indicate appellant was aware of smuggling activities involving diversion of smuggled cigarettes concealed in transit container, providing transportation and...

Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

Interest on delayed refund of SAD - As per the order, the period of delay to mere 7 days whereas as per the appellant the actual delay has been from 857 days to 399 days...

The appellant's appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal, and the penalty imposed u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, was set aside. It was held that when an assessee...

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Levy of penalty u/s 78 of FA - services received from abroad, but service tax not paid - even if the appellant pays service tax, they would be eligible for the credit...

CENVAT Credit - exempt service or not - amount of interest received by the appellant on the delayed payment of the amount of consideration received from the sale of...

Penalty imposed u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules 2002 set aside due to violation of principles of natural justice and lack of evidence. Department's case based solely on...

Valuation of imported goods - undervaluation - deemed relationship between GOI, OMIFCO and the Appellants - related party or not - Department has not produced any...

Appellant not the importer of motorbike, hence not liable to pay Customs Duty u/s 28 of Customs Act, 1962. Confiscation of motorbike set aside due to lack of finding on...

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

Quick Updates: