Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2025 Year 2025 This

The ITAT dismissed the assessee's appeal. It upheld the ...


Deduction u/s 54B disallowed as land not used for agriculture in preceding 2 years.

January 10, 2025

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The ITAT dismissed the assessee's appeal. It upheld the revisional order passed by the PCIT u/s 263, setting aside the original assessment order which had erroneously allowed deduction u/s 54B. The ITAT observed that the AO failed to inquire whether the capital asset was used for agricultural purposes for two years immediately preceding the transfer, a prerequisite for claiming deduction u/s 54B. The PCIT had obtained a report substantiating that no agricultural activities were carried out during the relevant period on the properties sold and purchased by the assessee. Relying on the precedent in Ramanbhai Bholidas Patel, the ITAT held that s.54B deduction is not applicable if the land was not used for agricultural purposes in the two years preceding the transfer date.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Exemption u/s 54B - Since the land sold has been proven to be used for agriculture purpose in the preceding two years and the land purchased by the assessee has been...

  2. Deduction u/s 54B - part of land was not cultivable- Sec.54B does not specify that the entire land should be used for cultivation, if any part of the land is under...

  3. For the claim of exemption u/s 54B, it is not necessary that the land should have been used for agricultural purposes for full two years immediately preceding the date...

  4. Disallowance u/s 54B - LTCG - Proof of agriculture activity on land transferred - the assessee had cultivated the agriculture crops during the period of 2 years...

  5. Deduction u/s 54B - LTCG - Agriculture land purchased in the name Individual on behalf of HUF - Sale of agriculture land owned by HUF - In substance, the HUF is owner of...

  6. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - justification for claim of deduction u/s. 54B - Section 54B of the Act is not applicable, if the land was not used for agricultural purposes in...

  7. Deduction u/s 54B - denial - sale of agricultural land standing in assesee's name - purchases of land in name of son and daughter-in-law - disallowed the exemption u/s 54B - HC

  8. Deduction u/s 54B - Benefit of exemption denined on the ground that, the land was sold by the assessee to a developer and ultimately the land would be used for...

  9. Exemption u/s 54B - The plain language of Section 54B requires the land sold to have been in use by the assessee or by his parents or the HUF for agricultural purposes...

  10. Exemption u/s 54B - agriculture land - assessee has failed to substantiate her claim with regard to the nature of land and its user in the immediately preceding two...

  11. Exemption u/s 54B - Agriculture land - vacant land - if the AO comes to the conclusion that the impugned lands are agricultural lands, still the capital gain arising on...

  12. Addition u/s 56 - difference amount of stamp duty value and purchase value - Whether such agriculture land falls in the definition of capital asset u/s 2(14) or whether...

  13. LTCG - Exemption u/s 54B in respect of gains on sale of agriculture land - two crop seasons in the two years preceding to the date of transfer, meets the legal...

  14. Revision u/s 263 - Claim of deduction u/s 54B - sale of agriculture land after plotting - the issue is not limited to the capital gain or business income but the issue...

  15. The assessee sold agricultural land during the year which the Assessing Officer (AO) treated as a capital asset, leading to levy of long-term capital gains tax. The...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates