Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2025 Year 2025 This

The ITAT dismissed the assessee's appeal. It upheld the ...


ITAT Upholds PCIT's Order u/s 263; Denies Section 54B Deduction for Non-Agricultural Land Use.

January 10, 2025

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The ITAT dismissed the assessee's appeal. It upheld the revisional order passed by the PCIT u/s 263, setting aside the original assessment order which had erroneously allowed deduction u/s 54B. The ITAT observed that the AO failed to inquire whether the capital asset was used for agricultural purposes for two years immediately preceding the transfer, a prerequisite for claiming deduction u/s 54B. The PCIT had obtained a report substantiating that no agricultural activities were carried out during the relevant period on the properties sold and purchased by the assessee. Relying on the precedent in Ramanbhai Bholidas Patel, the ITAT held that s.54B deduction is not applicable if the land was not used for agricultural purposes in the two years preceding the transfer date.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision allowing deductions under section 54B to the appellant. The Tribunal found that Khasra Girdawari records for Samvat 2074-2077...

  2. ITAT upheld taxpayer's claim for exemption under section 54B regarding capital gains from sale of agricultural land. Evidence showed consistent agricultural income in...

  3. Deduction u/s. 54B - agricultural land which is purchased prior to the sale of agricultural land - the assessee is not entitled to claim deduction u/s. 54B of the Act...

  4. Deduction u/s 54B - capital gain on sale of one agricultural land - investment made in two agricultural land - deduction is not allowable in respect of two separate...

  5. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of whether land sold should be treated as agricultural for Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) purposes. The Department did not...

  6. At the relevant point of sale of the land in question, the surrounding area was totally undeveloped and except mere future possibility to put the land into use for...

  7. Capital gain - Valuation - FMV determination - Conversion of agriculture land - reference to DVO - CIT(A) has correctly observed that the land sold in current year is...

  8. Nature of land sold - agricultural land or capital asset - the land is not subjected to any conversion as non-agricultural land by the assessee or any other concerned...

  9. The assessee sold agricultural land during the year which the Assessing Officer (AO) treated as a capital asset, leading to levy of long-term capital gains tax. The...

  10. MAT computation - exclusion of profit on sale of agricultural land while computing book profit u/s 115JB - This land was used for agricultural purpose and considering...

  11. Capital gain - Nature of land - Sale of agricultural land – There is no requirement in any Act more especially the I.T. Act that only the self-cultivated land will be...

  12. Mere inclusion of land in the special zone without any infrastructure development thereupon or without establishing and proving that the land was put into use for...

  13. ITAT determined that income derived from mushroom cultivation qualifies as agricultural income exempt under section 10(1). Following precedent from Inventaa Industries,...

  14. ITAT ruled against AO's addition under s.56(2)(vii)(b) of Rs. 50,65,900/- in a limited scrutiny case, finding the AO lacked jurisdiction to examine property valuation...

  15. HC upheld the tax authorities' determination that the disputed land was not agricultural land under Section 2(14)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, making gains from its sale...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates