ITAT partly allowed assessee's appeals and remanded matter to AO ...

ITAT Partially Allows Dissolved Company's Appeal; Case Remanded to AO for Penalty Review Post-NCLT Resolution Plan Approval.

January 10, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT partly allowed assessee's appeals and remanded matter to AO to take necessary steps u/s 156A regarding penalty u/s 271(1)(c) against dissolved company. NCLT had approved resolution plan and granted moratorium under IBC. As per Section 14, after moratorium, pending proceedings against corporate debtor are prohibited. Relying on Supreme Court's decision, ITAT held once resolution plan is approved, claims get frozen and are binding on all stakeholders including government authorities. Since resolution plan was yet to be finalized, matter was remanded to AO.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT partly allowed assessee's appeals and remanded matter to AO ...

ITAT Partially Allows Dissolved Company's Appeal; Case Remanded to AO for Penalty Review Post-NCLT Resolution Plan Approval.

January 10, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The ITAT addressed various issues including disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D, where Revenue challenged deletion of disallowance made by AO. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision,...

CESTAT partly allowed appeal concerning duty demands on DTA sales by SEZ unit. Court held Commissioner of Customs has jurisdiction to demand duty on unauthorized DTA...

ITAT set aside penalty under s271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act following deletion of quantum addition in earlier proceedings. The underlying dispute involved classification...

This is a summary of an order from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dealing with various additions and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and...

The ITAT held that outstanding receivables from Associated Enterprises constitute an international transaction requiring separate benchmarking under section 92B...

ITAT allowed the appeal and remanded the case for reassessment. The Tribunal found procedural irregularities in the assessment order, specifically noting that the...

HC determined the ITAT's decision to remand the matter to CIT(A) was improper when the issue was purely legal under Rule 27. Given ITAT had acknowledged the legal nature...

AO imposed penalty under s.270A for unsubstantiated business expenses including advertising, development, land, and excavation charges, which were disallowed from...

ITAT held no TDS liability arose for payments made to supplier for railway tracks as no statutory provision mandated tax deduction on material supply payments during the...

ITAT ruled against AO's addition under s.56(2)(vii)(b) of Rs. 50,65,900/- in a limited scrutiny case, finding the AO lacked jurisdiction to examine property valuation...

The assessee was penalized u/s 271(1)(c) for addition of sale consideration due to lack of vouchers. The CIT(A) partly confirmed the addition for want of vouchers. The...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

Review petition - Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Tribunal sustaining the levy without providing an opportunity of hearing - Review applicant had paid entire tax amount...

AO disallowed entire cost of indexation claimed by assessee for lack of documentary evidence. ITAT held denial unjustified, directed AO to allow 50% of indexation...

The ITAT Chennai ruled on LTCG deduction u/s 54, stating that investment in more than one property is not allowed. Assessee invested in two distinct properties in...

Quick Updates: