The appellant failed to submit requisite documents within ...

Penalty of Rs. 10,000 upheld for procedural lapses in provisional assessment under Customs Act.

January 11, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

The appellant failed to submit requisite documents within stipulated time for provisional assessment under Customs Act, 1962 and Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations, 2011 due to pending appeals on same issue. The adjudicating authority imposed Rs.10,000 penalty for procedural violations. CESTAT held Rs.10,000 penalty sufficient considering appellant's position and set aside Commissioner (Appeals)' order enhancing penalty to Rs.50,000 per Bill of Entry. Appeal allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The appellant failed to submit requisite documents within ...

Penalty of Rs. 10,000 upheld for procedural lapses in provisional assessment under Customs Act.

January 11, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

The case involves imposition of penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 for misusing drawback benefit through fraudulent exports....

The penalty imposed u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellant (a Customs Broker) for abetting the clearance of undeclared/mis-declared export goods was...

The CESTAT upheld the duty demand, confiscation of imported goods for non-fulfilment of export obligation u/s 111(o), imposition of redemption fine u/s 125, and...

Customs broker's license suspension case involving violations of Regulations 10(d) and 10(e) of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2018. Gross mis-declaration...

Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) and u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abetment in undervaluation - evasion of Customs Duty by several syndicates of crane...

The case pertains to the imposition of a fine and penalty for the rejection of the declared value and redetermination of the value u/r 12 of the Customs Valuation...

The CESTAT held that the imported betel nuts were rightly classified under CTH 0802 8030. While the minimum import price fixed by DGFT could not be treated as tariff...

The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

Levy of penalty on CHA u/s 114(i) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - acts of omission and commission in relation to the attempted illegal export of Red Sanders - So,...

Provisional release of detained goods - The department's insistence on a 100% bank guarantee of Rs. 25,00,000/- was deemed arbitrary and onerous, especially considering...

Proprietorship concerns lack legal personhood; proprietor deemed necessary party. Proceeds of crime from VAT fraud laundered through multiple entities. Appellant's...

Levy of penalty- Fraudulent issuance of GDRs by the Company - the imposition of penalty upon the appellant after 12 years from date of resigning is excessive. In a large...

The High Court considered a case involving the release of seized goods u/s 110A. The issue was the non-issuance of a show cause notice within the stipulated time due to...

Misdeclaration of imported polished marble slabs as unpolished slabs. Excess quantity found during physical verification. Customs duty demanded along with interest and...

Quick Updates: