Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2025 Year 2025 This

Debt claim below statutory threshold. Interest component ...


NCLAT dismisses operational creditor's insolvency petition on multiple grounds.

January 17, 2025

Case Laws     IBC     AT

Debt claim below statutory threshold. Interest component excluded from operational debt absent express agreement. Claims within Section 10A period excluded. Pending commercial suit between parties bars insolvency application u/s 8. Section 9 petition not maintainable on multiple grounds. Appeal dismissed by NCLAT.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Corporate insolvency process - Power of Board to decide amount is to be paid to the ‘Financial Creditor’ or ‘Operational Creditor’ including the liquidation value - SC...

  2. The NCLAT held that the statutory protection granted to operational creditors u/s 30(2)(b) of the IBC is that they shall not receive less than the specified amounts. The...

  3. CIRP - Aggrieved person or not / Locus Standi of minor operational creditor - The Appellate tribunal (NCLAT) found that the appellant, as a minor operational creditor,...

  4. Section 53(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) provides for the order of priority in the distribution of liquidation assets. Financial debts owed to unsecured...

  5. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Operational Creditor u/s 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The application was initially rejected...

  6. Maintainability of section 9 application - Operational credit or not? - In the CIRP what amount Operational Creditor i.e. Appellant is entitled or receives are different...

  7. The Adjudicating Authority rightly dismissed the Company Petition filed u/s 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) on the ground of pre-existing disputes between...

  8. Initiation of CIRP u/s 9 - time limitation - threshold limit of amount claimed - With respect to 234 invoices, which are payable within 30 days of the invoices, 224...

  9. Challenge to an approved Resolution Plan where no consideration was given to payment to an Operational Creditor. The key points are: Section 30(2)(b) mandates that...

  10. NCLAT dismissed appeal concerning operational creditor's Section 9 application under IBC. Court held that while Section 8 notice is mandatory prerequisite for filing...

  11. CIRP - Rejection of Section 9 Application on the ground of pre-existing dispute - The dispute stemmed from services provided by the Operational Creditor to the Corporate...

  12. CIRP initiated against the Corporate Debtor terminated upon reaching full and final settlement with the Operational Creditor who filed Section 7 application. Quantum of...

  13. NCLAT dismissed appeal against order rejecting Section 9 application by Operational Creditor to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. Pre-existing dispute...

  14. The NCLAT held that the corporate debtor failed to substantiate a pre-existing dispute with the operational creditor regarding the unpaid operational debt. The corporate...

  15. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order and dismissed the appeal filed by the Resolution Professional (RP) against the Operational Creditor. The...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates