The ITAT held that M/s Automotive Stamping Assemblies Ltd. and ...

M/s Automotive Stamping Assemblies Ltd. & Majestic Ltd. accepted as comparables under TNMM.

January 22, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT held that M/s Automotive Stamping Assemblies Ltd. and M/s Majestic Ltd. should be accepted as comparable entities for TP analysis under TNMM as they were initially selected and not persistent loss-making companies. M/s Spicer India Pvt. Ltd. was rightly included despite related party transactions as TNMM requires broad comparability. For M/s JBM Auto Ltd., the issue was restored to the AO/TPO to re-adjudicate after examining segmental information. Forex losses/gains were held operating in nature being linked to import transactions. Economic adjustments were denied as not granted earlier by the Tribunal. The forex loss disallowance u/s 43A was restored to the AO for fresh adjudication based on bifurcation of capital and revenue components. The additional depreciation claim was dismissed as not claimed originally and being revenue neutral.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT held that M/s Automotive Stamping Assemblies Ltd. and ...

M/s Automotive Stamping Assemblies Ltd. & Majestic Ltd. accepted as comparables under TNMM.

January 22, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

HELD: DRP excluded forex losses and gains from operating income computation based on safe harbor rules. However, both being of similar nature, forex gains to be treated...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the export commission paid by the assessee to foreign agents in Korea and Indonesia for sales, marketing, and customer...

The High Court upheld the decision of the ITAT regarding the selection of comparables for benchmarking analysis under the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM). The...

Tribunal upheld assessee's contention on functional dissimilarity of comparables E-clerx Services Ltd., Acropetal Technologies Ltd., Infosys BPO Ltd. and TCS EServe Ltd....

TP Adjustment - MAM Adjustment - ALP adjustment -In TNMM what is to be seen is the functional comparability and not the product comparability. Further, it is observed...

TP Adjustment - selection of most appropriate method (MAM) - Resale Price Method or Transactional Net Margin Method - Introduction of Fresh Comparables - Removal of 3%...

The Appellate Tribunal ruled on Transfer Pricing Adjustment, excluding companies with high turnover from comparables. Companies like Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd., Tata...

Determination of arm's length price (ALP) for international transactions, focusing on the selection of comparable companies. It excludes companies like Elofic Industries...

TP Adjustment - Comparable selection - determination of the arm’s length price (ALP) of international transactions - The appellant contested the inclusion of two...

The Appellate Tribunal held that negative working capital adjustment cannot be made for a captive service provider. L&T Infotech Ltd. and Infosys Ltd. were excluded from...

Transfer pricing Adjustments - ALP - Once internal comparable was available, along with the segmental details, TPO was required to examine the same and carry out the...

This case pertains to a transfer pricing (TP) adjustment dispute involving the selection of the most appropriate method - Resale Price Method (RPM) or Transactional Net...

Comparable selection for determining arm's length price (ALP) adjustment. Appeals limited to including or excluding certain uncontrolled entities as comparables...

TP Adjustment - rejecting the Internal Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) as Most Appropriate Method (MAM) - effectively all the 12 comparables chosen by the...

Transfer pricing adjustment made to alleged international transaction of AMP expenditure incurred by assessee disallowed due to lack of evidence that assessee agreed to...

Quick Updates: