NCLAT affirmed the recall of order dated 04.06.2024 in a Section ...

NCLAT Upholds Order Recall After Corporate Debtor Misrepresented Facts About Unit Holders in Section 7 IBC Homebuyers Case.

January 23, 2025

Case Laws IBC AT

NCLAT affirmed the recall of order dated 04.06.2024 in a Section 7 IBC petition involving homebuyers. The Corporate Debtor had misrepresented facts regarding the number of unit holders and eligibility requirements under the second proviso to Section 7(1) of IBC. While the Corporate Debtor claimed 282 unit holders with only 12 allottees as petitioners, evidence showed the homebuyers had filed compliance affidavits with supporting MAHARERA certificates. The Tribunal held that inherent powers u/r 11 of NCLT Rules could be invoked to prevent abuse of process where orders were obtained through misrepresentation. The recall was justified as the original order was not decided on merits but influenced by distorted facts and procedural irregularities.

View Source

← Previous Next →

NCLAT affirmed the recall of order dated 04.06.2024 in a Section ...

NCLAT Upholds Order Recall After Corporate Debtor Misrepresented Facts About Unit Holders in Section 7 IBC Homebuyers Case.

January 23, 2025

Case Laws IBC AT

You may also like:

Corporate Debtors failed to deliver housing units to allottees within stipulated time despite receiving payments. NCLAT rejected Corporate Debtors' contentions regarding...

Eligibility of ex-promoter/Corporate Debtor u/s 29A read with Section 240A of the IBC to submit a resolution plan claiming the benefits of MSME - rejection of Resolution...

The NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by the corporate debtor against the order admitting the application u/s 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) filed by the...

Admission of section 7 application - financial debt owed by the Corporate Debtor or not - Home Buyers - The application was filed by respondents, who were allottees in a...

Corporate debtor defaulted in repaying financial debt owed to financial creditor. NCLAT dismissed appeal, upholding orders of adjudicating authority. Transaction...

Liquidation of Corporate Debtor - timeline prescribed in the liquidation proceedings or not - Since the objective of the IBC is to prefer resolution over liquidation and...

The NCLT had directed the release of an industrial promotion subsidy claim amount to the Corporate Debtor, which was sanctioned prior to the commencement of CIRP. The...

The NCLT/NCLAT could have exercised jurisdiction under section 60(5)(c) of the IBC to stay the termination of the PPA by the appellant, since the appellant sought to...

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the appeal, upholding the order admitting the Section 7 application filed by ICICI Bank against the...

The NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the quashing of the e-auction conducted on 31.01.2024 for the sale of the Corporate Debtor as a going concern and the...

IBC - Invoking Bank Guarantee - Corporate Debtor has issued bank guarantee for ensuring the price of goods. The bank guarantee is irrevocable and unconditional and...

The NCLAT held that the corporate debtor failed to substantiate a pre-existing dispute with the operational creditor regarding the unpaid operational debt. The corporate...

Rejection of Section 7 Application - NPA - Corporate Debtor unable to de-risk the live BGs within the time allowed - A settlement was reached between the parties, where...

The NCLAT held that the amount of Rs. 1 crore lying in the "No Lien Account" with the Appellant bank belongs to the Corporate Debtor and is an asset of the Corporate...

Section 7 application filed by the Financial Creditor was erroneously rejected by the Adjudicating Authority despite debt and default by the Corporate Debtor. The...

Quick Updates: