Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2025 Year 2025 This

NCLAT upheld the admission of Section 7 application under IBC, ...


Financial Creditor's Project Monitoring Role Does Not Absolve Corporate Debtor From Payment Under IBC Section 7

February 14, 2025

Case Laws     IBC     AT

NCLAT upheld the admission of Section 7 application under IBC, confirming the existence of financial debt and default by corporate debtor. The tribunal rejected appellant's contention that Project Monitoring Committee (PMC) controlled by financial creditor was responsible for default. NCLAT emphasized that PMC's constitution to monitor project execution did not diminish corporate debtor's payment obligations. Following precedents in E.S. Krishnamurthy and Innoventive Industries, NCLAT confirmed Adjudicating Authority's jurisdiction was limited to determining debt existence and default occurrence. The appeal was dismissed as corporate debtor failed to honor repayment obligations despite acknowledging debt multiple times, satisfying Section 7 requirements for CIRP initiation.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Initiation of CIRP - Flat Buyer is a Financial Creditor or not - Whether ‘HBPL’ falls within the ambit of the definition of ‘Corporate Debtor’, as defined under Section...

  2. The NCLAT upheld the admission of the Section 7 application filed by the Financial Creditor (Respondent No.1) for initiating CIRP against the Corporate Debtor. It held...

  3. Initiation of CIRP - NCLT rejected the application - Financial Creditors - non-disbursement of part of financial assistance sanctioned by the Financial Creditors -...

  4. Admission of section 7 application - financial debt owed by the Corporate Debtor or not - Home Buyers - The application was filed by respondents, who were allottees in a...

  5. Financial Creditors - The disbursal was made by CDR Lenders to the Corporate Debtor and the Appellant(s) were Personal Guarantors/ Corporate Guarantors to guarantee the...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal affirmed the decision to exclude the Appellant and other unsecured Financial Creditors from the Committee of Creditors (CoC). The key issues were...

  7. Corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) initiated against corporate debtor and corporate guarantor. Financial creditor granted loan to corporate debtor, secured...

  8. Admission of section 7 application - financial debt or not - The Tribunal affirmed that the disbursal of ₹5 crores to the corporate debtor by the financial...

  9. Secured financial creditor or not - The creation of pledge of shares by the Corporate Debtor is said to be in regard to the money lent to WLD and BRASSCO. The Appellants...

  10. Initiation of CIRP - The Appellant, who is a speculative investor, cannot claim status and benefits as financial creditor under Explanation (i) of Section 5(8)(f) of the...

  11. Financial Creditors or not - a person having only security interest over the assets of corporate debtor, even if falling within the description of 'secured creditor' by...

  12. The Corporate Debtor denied the existence of a loan agreement with 12% interest, as claimed by the Financial Creditor in the Section 7 application. To qualify as a...

  13. Initiation of CIRP - All the projects of Corporate Debtor (Real Estate developer i.e Supertech Ltd.) or specified project to be proceeded against - In ‘CIRP’ Process,...

  14. Corporate debtor defaulted in repaying financial debt owed to financial creditor. NCLAT dismissed appeal, upholding orders of adjudicating authority. Transaction...

  15. Corporate Debtors failed to deliver housing units to allottees within stipulated time despite receiving payments. NCLAT rejected Corporate Debtors' contentions regarding...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates