ITAT quashed reassessment proceedings regarding alleged ...

Tax Tribunal Invalidates Reassessment Based on Uncorroborated Digital Evidence from Third-Party Search in Property Purchase Case.

January 25, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT quashed reassessment proceedings regarding alleged undisclosed "on-money" payments to builder for residential property. AO's reliance on pen drive and documents seized during third-party search operation deemed insufficient without corroborative evidence. Assessee consistently denied making cash payments above agreement value. Critical procedural deficiencies noted: seized materials not confronted with assessee, statements under s.131 not shared, and no explicit mention of assessee in seized documents. ITAT emphasized that uncorroborated digital evidence from third-party searches cannot constitute credible basis for reassessment. Violation of natural justice principles where adverse materials not provided to assessee. Addition deleted as AO failed to establish authenticity of digital evidence or verify reliability of pen drive data.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT quashed reassessment proceedings regarding alleged ...

Tax Tribunal Invalidates Reassessment Based on Uncorroborated Digital Evidence from Third-Party Search in Property Purchase Case.

January 25, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The ITAT invalidated digital evidence seized during a search operation, specifically a pendrive, as inadmissible under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act. The...

Digital images and Excel files found on partner's phone cannot be relied upon for making additions u/s 69C for unexplained expenditure. Loose papers and documents not...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed various issues in the case. The AO made additions based on uncorroborated documents seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue, affirming the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that...

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

Validity of reassessment proceedings questioned due to delayed digital submission of Form 10. Emphasis on due disclosure over procedural digital filing requirements....

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 or assessment u/s 153C - reassessment was made based on the materials found in the course of search conducted on third party - The...

HC invalidated ex-parte assessment order and demand notices that were solely based on a previously quashed FIR. The department failed to conduct independent...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reason to believe - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the reassessment proceedings were initiated solely based on the...

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

The assessee provided documentary evidence supporting the purchase and subsequent sale of shares leading to long-term capital gains (LTCG). The evidence included...

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal u/s 249(4)(b) due to non-payment of advance tax. The assessee did not respond to the notice u/s 142(1) to clarify tax payment....

CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside service tax demands predicated solely on Form 26AS without substantive evidence of service provision. The tribunal consistently...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

Quick Updates: