HC declined to address allocation of undisclosed Shilpgram ...

High Court: No Interest Under 158BFA(1) When Seized Documents Unavailable to Taxpayer, Upholds 70-30 Income Split in Shilpgram Case.

January 29, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

HC declined to address allocation of undisclosed Shilpgram Scheme income between parties as factual matter, upholding Tribunal's 70-30 split. On interest charges under s.158BFA(1), court affirmed Tribunal's ruling that assessee could not be charged interest for delayed return filing during period when seized documents were unavailable. Court determined interest charges inappropriate until photocopies of seized materials were provided to assessee, as compilation of return was impossible without access to these documents. Question regarding income allocation dismissed as factual; interest charge question resolved in assessee's favor.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC declined to address allocation of undisclosed Shilpgram ...

High Court: No Interest Under 158BFA(1) When Seized Documents Unavailable to Taxpayer, Upholds 70-30 Income Split in Shilpgram Case.

January 29, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

The ITAT partly allowed the assessee's appeal. Travel expenses were partly disallowed by 30% considering personal element, while 70% were allowed as business expenses...

Disallowances under section 30(1) - expenditure incurred on repair and renovation of renting premises allowed - HC

Classification dispute regarding imported goods "MPC7E MRATE IRB 10G/40G 100 QSFP28-MPC-L3 Line Cards [Router Line Cards]" under Customs Tariff Item (CTI) 8517 69 30 or...

HC permitted petitioner to file statutory appeal u/s 107 of TNGST Act within 30 days. Penalty of 200% of seized goods value imposed u/s 129(1)(a) for transporting goods...

Validity of the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) or 158BFA - AO has levied the penalty under section 271(1)(C) of the Act by observing that the assessee has concealed/furnished...

The ITAT Mumbai addressed errors in capital gain computation. The Assessee's claim of ₹ 859,680 was accepted over the AO's ₹ 791,221. An application u/s 154...

Loss on revaluation of security - securities maintained as per RBI Guidelines - only 30% treated as stock in trade - 70% treated as long term asset - HC

Set off of loss/unabsorbed depreciation from windmill – Not in a position claim deduction u/s 80IA being loss - Section 70(1) comes to the rescue of the assessee - Sec....

Seizure of documents - proceeding under Section 70 of the OGST Act - grievance of the petitioner is that, since the documents called for by the OGST Authority has been...

Suspension of Custodianship – Unauthorised removal of seized Red Sander logs - Appellant being custodian of seized container had violated Regulations enshrined in...

Tax authority rejected rectification application filed by taxpayer for zero-rated supply citing violation of principles of natural justice. Court examined impugned...

Scope of SCN - Presumption with regards to documents seized - In view of Section 36A of Central Excise Act, 1944 it is only when such document is tendered in evidence...

Validity of assessment u/s 153A - ‘Document’ was seized during the course of the search proceedings from the premises of Cosmos group, therefore, as per Sec. 132(4A)(i)...

Set-off of losses against income from other sources u/s 70 - Applicability of provision of section 10B - petitioner had the status of EOU for a period of 5 years - The...

Quick Updates: