Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2025 Year 2025 This

ITAT quashed penalties under sections 271D and 271E for ...


Penalties Waived For Cash Loans Under Section 269SS Due To Genuine Financial Crisis And Lender's Anonymity Concerns

February 3, 2025

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

ITAT quashed penalties under sections 271D and 271E for accepting cash loans of Rs. 17,00,000 in violation of section 269SS. Tribunal considered assessee's circumstances as middle-class, uneducated individual who received loans from agriculturists seeking anonymity due to CBI concerns. Reasonable cause was established given the timing of loans immediately after CBI actions and assessee's dire financial need. The subsequent cash repayment was made on lender's insistence. Given these mitigating factors and genuine circumstances, ITAT determined penalties were not warranted under sections 271D and 271E read with section 274, setting aside JCIT's penalty orders.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty u/s. 271A(2)(g) - default in compliance of TDS provision - financial crisis - The assessee has demonstrated from the material placed on record that...

  2. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(C) - exemption u/s 80-IC - income in the garb of fictitious cash sales - Assessing Officer as well as the Appellate Authority, rightly gave...

  3. Non-genuine unsecured loan u/s. 68 - When part of the loans taken from the same lender has been accepted by the Assessing Officer as genuine, then it is not...

  4. Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee...

  5. Penalty u/s 76 of FA, 1994 - delay in payment of service tax due to financial crisis - the head office has not release the fund, the appellant could not be pay service...

  6. Penalty u/s 78 - assess had collected the service tax but failed to deposit the same with the Government account due to financial crisis - entire amount of service tax...

  7. Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

  8. Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - If loan in cash is taken once or twice, in exceptional exigencies, may be a ground for interference, but when the fact remains that a lender...

  9. Addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee, who did not maintain books of accounts, received interest-free loans from Shri Anil Kumar Singh through normal...

  10. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

  11. Penalty u/s 78 - cash crisis/ fund shortage - cash crunch could not be substantiated by it as it could generate cash of huge amount for payment within two days of visit...

  12. Penalty u/s 271D - Taking cash loans in violation of Section 269SS - To meet the financial requirements of repayment, for which the lenders were hard pressing, the...

  13. Cash deposit during demonetization period treated as unexplained cash credit. Assessee's claim of introducing cash as capital in proprietary concern not accepted due to...

  14. The ITAT Visakhapatnam dealt with a case involving penalty u/s. 271D for receiving cash in relation to the transfer of immovable property, which falls under section...

  15. Addition u/s 28(iv) r.w. section 41 r.w. explanation 2(iv) – the amount waived by the lender bank is not an income u/s 2(24) of the Act and further Section 28 also does...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates