HC dismissed writ petitions challenging revisional orders under ...

Firm Wins Refund with 9% Interest After Tax Revision Challenge Under AVAT Act and CST Act

February 6, 2025

Case Laws VAT / Sales Tax HC

HC dismissed writ petitions challenging revisional orders under AVAT Act and CST Act. The court found Circular No. 15/2010 inapplicable to Revisional Authority's powers. The revisional orders were based on proper enquiries including Excise Documents, interstate certificates, and dealer verification. Finding no evidence of fraud, collusion, or perversity in the orders dated 26.02.2020, the court upheld them. The petitioner firm was granted refund of pre-deposits with 9% interest from 08.05.2021. Tax authorities were directed to issue fresh assessment orders within six weeks and process refunds within four weeks thereafter. The court emphasized that pre-deposits for revision admission are not duty payments and must be refunded upon successful revision.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC dismissed writ petitions challenging revisional orders under ...

Firm Wins Refund with 9% Interest After Tax Revision Challenge Under AVAT Act and CST Act

February 6, 2025

Case Laws VAT / Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

Denial of interest on the refund claim sanctioned to the appellant - it is seen that in ordinary course of refund arising out of finalization of provisional assessment...

The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 aims to settle tax disputes. The term "appeal" under the Act includes writ petitions challenging tax orders, as per Supreme...

Payment of interest u/s 244A to the deductor on the refund of tax made u/s 240 - Since we have awarded simple interest at 6%, we are not granting any cost in this case....

The appellants challenged the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) denying eligible interest on the refunded amount. The court held that interest accrued on the deposited...

Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act - VSV Act - settlement of the dispute of petitioner for assessment year 2015-16 without withdrawing the interest already granted under...

Electronic commerce operators (ECOs) required to pay tax u/s 9(5) of CGST Act for specified services supplied through their platform are not required to reverse...

Proposed amendment enables recovery of existing liabilities under Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 from seized assets...

The court held that the assessee was entitled to refund of Rs. 3,50,00,000/- deposited with the department, along with statutory interest and interest on refunds. The...

Interest on Delayed Refund of Input Tax Credit - Proviso to Section 56 specified increased interest rates for refunds arising from orders of adjudicating or appellate...

The case involves a dispute over the jurisdiction of the Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) to entertain an appeal u/s 142(9) of the CGST Act, 2017 regarding refund of CENVAT...

The petitioner's denial of refund of input tax credit debited as a pre-deposit was challenged. The court held that the non-inclusion of freight and pumping charges...

Interest expenditure - assessee had availed loan at the interest rate of 12% p.a., whereas, it has advanced loan to a sister concern by charging 9% interest p.a - The...

Refund of service tax - commercial and industrial construction service - time limitation - since the claim for refund is based on the decision of the Delhi High Court in...

The summary focuses on the refund claim rejection based on the ground that the amount paid under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) is not admissible u/r 9(1)(bb) of CENVAT...

The High Court held that u/s 54 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, when the input tax credit paid is higher than the output tax, the dealer is entitled to seek a...

Quick Updates: