Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2025 Year 2025 This

HC held that principles of natural justice were violated when ...


Tax Department's 24-Hour Notice and 48-Hour Reply Window Violates Natural Justice, Order Set Aside for Fresh Hearing

February 10, 2025

Case Laws     GST     HC

HC held that principles of natural justice were violated when tax authorities provided insufficient time to petitioner for filing reply and personal hearing. The impugned order was deemed arbitrary and illegal as authorities gave only 24 hours notice for hearing and 48 hours for manual reply submission, followed by order passage within 24 hours thereafter. Court criticized departmental practice of solely relying on online portal notifications without RPAD communication. The matter was remanded back for reconsideration with direction to provide adequate opportunity of hearing. Court emphasized that opportunity of hearing must be meaningful rather than nominal, recommending adoption of RPAD notices alongside digital communications to ensure proper service and prevent wastage of departmental time.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Petitioner challenged validity of re-assessment u/s 148A. HC quashed impugned order and notice initiating re-assessment proceedings issued by 3rd Respondent. HC held...

  2. The High Court quashed the impugned order canceling the petitioner's GST registration, citing violation of natural justice principles. The order and subsequent show...

  3. Impugned assessment order violated principles of natural justice as petitioner was not provided further opportunity after show cause notice nine months prior....

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - violation of principles of natural justice - Shorter period notice given - less than 24 hours given to the petitioner to appear - This shorter...

  5. Reassessment proceedings were ex-parte, violating principles of natural justice as petitioner was not provided reasonable opportunity to file reply documents due to...

  6. Remission of duty - molasses lost during storage - It is not disputed that the loss is within the prescribed limit of 2%. Rule 21 does not lay down any procedure for...

  7. Validity of notice issued u/s 73 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 challenged due to non-consideration of petitioner's reply, violating principles of natural...

  8. Rejection of petition challenging classification of "Autoclaved Aerated Concrete blocks" (AAC Blocks) under residuary Entry 69 of Part C instead of proposed Entry 15 of...

  9. Wrongful claim of Input tax credit - bogus supply - vague SCN - SCN did contain the details about the foundation of the case - principles of natural justice - From the...

  10. Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as the valuable right of the petitioner to defend through a reply and right to personal hearing was denied. The...

  11. Principles of natural justice violated in tax adjudication process under U.P. GST Act, 2017. No opportunity for personal hearing provided to petitioner despite request...

  12. The High Court set aside an assessment order due to lack of reasonable opportunity for the petitioner to contest the tax demand on merits. The show cause notice and...

  13. Ex parte order passed based on old PAN number challenged. Society contended all transactions accounted for in audited books, returns filed with new PAN. Department...

  14. The impugned order was passed without considering the reply filed by the petitioner and without affording an opportunity of personal hearing, despite a request being...

  15. Validity of provisional attachment order challenged - petitioner lawful owner of property - no notice issued violating natural justice principles - duty on Adjudicating...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates