ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal against CIT(A)'s order deleting ...

Share Capital and Loan Additions Deleted as Assessee Proves Creditworthiness Under Section 68 Through Documentary Evidence

February 11, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal against CIT(A)'s order deleting additions under s.68 for alleged bogus share capital and unsecured loans. The assessee successfully demonstrated identity, creditworthiness, and transaction genuineness by providing shareholder confirmations, bank statements, and ITRs. AO's additions were rejected as based merely on doubt without contradictory evidence. CIT(A)'s partial allowance of s.14A disallowance was upheld, limiting it to investments yielding exempt income. ITAT affirmed CIT(A)'s authority to admit additional evidence without mandatory AO remand under s.250(4) and Rule 46A(4). The related interest expenses on unsecured loans were consequently allowed, and corresponding adjustments to WIP were permitted.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal against CIT(A)'s order deleting ...

Share Capital and Loan Additions Deleted as Assessee Proves Creditworthiness Under Section 68 Through Documentary Evidence

February 11, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

The assessee successfully discharged the onus u/s 68 regarding share capital introduced by the company director, a major shareholder, proving identity, creditworthiness,...

Addition u/s 68 - share application money received as unaccounted cash credit - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction...

Unexplained share capital and premium received by assessee company was its own unaccounted money flowing back in form of premium on share allotment. Assessee filed...

The assessee made investments in two firms by purchasing cold storage units funded by M/s. A.R. Constructions, where the assessee is a managing partner. The source for...

The ITAT held: Interest expenditure on unsecured loans is allowable deduction u/s 57(iii) as borrowed funds were utilized for advancing loans earning interest income,...

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed additions from unsecured loans and capital introduced by the assessee during demonetization. The Assessing Officer...

Addition u/s 56(2)(viia) - buy back of its own shares - The fact remains that the factum of extinguishment of the purchased shares by reducing the paid up capital of the...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained credit - Onus to prove - share capital introduced - the assessee failed to explain the sources of investment of cash of Rs. 10 lacs each by...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share premium and share capital - the assessee has substantially provided materials to prove the genuineness of the share holders apart...

Additions on account of Bogus unsecured loans and bogus share capital money - Revenue argued that the unsecured loan from entities controlled by a hawala operator should...

Addition u/s 68 - increase in share capital and share premium - As source of source is proved by the assessee in the instant case though the same is not required to be...

The assessee company received share capital and share application money from 13 share applicants. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition u/s 68, alleging that the...

The ITAT Mumbai, in a case involving addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash credit from loans taken from various parties, held that only loans taken during the current...

Non-proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share premium received cannot be treated as unexplained income if sufficient documentary evidence is provided....

Quick Updates: