HC ruled that gold bangles worn by a passenger returning to ...

Worn Gold Jewelry Not 'Baggage' Under Section 79 - Customs Officers Cannot Detain Personal Ornaments Worn By Travelers

February 13, 2025

Case Laws Customs HC

HC ruled that gold bangles worn by a passenger returning to India do not constitute "baggage" under the Customs Act 1962 and Baggage Rules 2016. The court determined that the Rule's provision regarding articles "carried on the person" exceeds the scope of the parent Act and is ultra vires. The Parliament consciously excluded worn jewelry from customs provisions, and until legislative amendment, officers cannot detain passengers' worn gold under Baggage Rules. The court ordered release of petitioner's 10 bangles within 7 days, finding no concealment as they were openly worn. The ruling emphasized that delegated legislation cannot exceed parent Act's scope and must respect fundamental rights and customs.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC ruled that gold bangles worn by a passenger returning to ...

Worn Gold Jewelry Not 'Baggage' Under Section 79 - Customs Officers Cannot Detain Personal Ornaments Worn By Travelers

February 13, 2025

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

HC determined that absolute confiscation of undeclared gold carried by travelers without offering redemption option violates customs regulations. While gold import is...

Gold ornaments worn by a foreign tourist entering India - In the absence of a statutory prescription in express terms to the effect that a foreign tourist entering...

HC invalidated confiscation orders regarding seized gold ornaments worn by petitioners at arrival. Court found multiple procedural violations: no show cause notice...

The High Court held that the personal gold jewelry, consisting of a necklace and bracelet weighing 0.178 grams, worn by a tourist traveling from Azerbaijan to India,...

The High Court held that personal jewellery which is not newly acquired during an overseas trip, but rather has been a used personal effect carried by the passenger,...

Customs officials seized gold jewelry from petitioners on 23-02-2023. Section 110(2) of Customs Act, 1962 mandates issuing show cause notice u/s 124 within six months of...

HC ruled in favor of petitioner, ordering release of seized gold jewelry within 7 days. The court determined that Baggage Rules 2016 provision regarding items "carried...

Gold Balas - Primary Gold seizure of gold ornaments pledged with the Appellant’s family - it is quite clear that a definite shape has been given to the gold Balas in...

Estimation of income on deficit gold jewellery - in search proceedings AO noted shortage of stock of gold ornaments - It is quite natural to give telescopic benefit to...

Smuggling - Gold - baggage rules - The petitioners, a husband and wife, returned to India from the United States and were stopped by customs officials upon arrival. The...

Seeking release of seized goods - gold/ornaments - personal belongings - case of the petitioners is that they were employed in Singapore for more than two years - All...

The applicant purchases second-hand gold or diamond jewelry from unregistered individuals, melts and transforms them into new pieces, altering their nature and...

Amendments to the AIRs of Duty Drawback on Gold Jewellery, Silver Jewellery and Silver Articles

Release of detained goods - whether the Officers of Kerala would have a jurisdiction to detain and seize the goods or at the best could have intimated the jurisdictional...

Smuggling - Gold bars - concealment in the baggage - the applicant crossed the green channel without declaring the impugned articles in his possession in the Customs...

Quick Updates: