HC ruled in favor of a Russian tourist regarding customs ...

Russian Tourist Wins Release of Gold Chain After Court Rules Personal Jewelry Falls Under Baggage Rules Section 124

March 1, 2025

Case Laws Customs HC

HC ruled in favor of a Russian tourist regarding customs detention of a gold chain. The court established three key principles: (1) bona fide personal jewelry falls under "personal effects" in Baggage Rules, requiring customs to distinguish between general jewelry and personal jewelry; (2) Baggage Rules have limited applicability to foreign tourists; and (3) the standard waiver form for show cause notice violates Section 124 of Customs Act and natural justice principles. The detention was deemed unlawful, and the court ordered release of the gold chain subject to applicable charges within four weeks. The ruling emphasizes that customs officials must evaluate tourist belongings case-by-case rather than applying mechanical detention procedures.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC ruled in favor of a Russian tourist regarding customs ...

Russian Tourist Wins Release of Gold Chain After Court Rules Personal Jewelry Falls Under Baggage Rules Section 124

March 1, 2025

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

The High Court held that the personal gold jewelry, consisting of a necklace and bracelet weighing 0.178 grams, worn by a tourist traveling from Azerbaijan to India,...

The High Court held that personal jewellery which is not newly acquired during an overseas trip, but rather has been a used personal effect carried by the passenger,...

Gold ornaments worn by a foreign tourist entering India - In the absence of a statutory prescription in express terms to the effect that a foreign tourist entering...

HC ruled in favor of petitioner, ordering release of seized gold jewelry within 7 days. The court determined that Baggage Rules 2016 provision regarding items "carried...

HC invalidated confiscation orders regarding seized gold ornaments worn by petitioners at arrival. Court found multiple procedural violations: no show cause notice...

Confiscation of gold jewellery brought in commercial quantity - Benefit of Baggage Rules denied - istake of not obtaining the export certificate from the Customs...

Appeal shall lie before the Tribunal under Section 129A or not - Baggage Rules, 2016 - Section 129A(1)(a) makes it clear that no appeal shall lie to the Tribunal in...

HC directed CBIC to reconsider Baggage Rules 2016, particularly provisions regarding declaration of jewellery by incoming international passengers. HC observed that...

Confiscation - Smuggling - Gold Bullion - Gold Jewellery - The appellant has not adduced any evidence to indicate that the same were procured locally. Appellants who...

Amendments to the AIRs of Duty Drawback on Gold Jewellery, Silver Jewellery and Silver Articles

Rate of Duty Drawback (AIR) on Articles of jewellery made of gold, Articles of jewellery made of silver and Articles made of silver falling under Chapter 71 reduced.

Customs officials seized gold jewelry from petitioners on 23-02-2023. Section 110(2) of Customs Act, 1962 mandates issuing show cause notice u/s 124 within six months of...

HC ruled that gold bangles worn by a passenger returning to India do not constitute "baggage" under the Customs Act 1962 and Baggage Rules 2016. The court determined...

Import of Gold - bonafide baggage or not - the petitioner has violated the provisions of the Customs and Baggage Rules, 2016. The petitioner was duty bound to declare...

Smuggling - Baggage Rules - Bonafide baggage or not - Gold Jewellery - Liquor - one fails to understand, petitioners who claim to be pilgrims visiting an alien country...

Quick Updates: