ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s ex-parte order for failing to comply ...

Tax Appeal Ex-parte Order Invalid: CIT(A) Failed To Provide Hearing And Reasoned Order Under Section 250(6)

February 14, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s ex-parte order for failing to comply with Section 250(6) requirements. The CIT(A) neither provided proper hearing opportunity nor issued a reasoned order addressing appeal grounds. Following judicial precedents establishing that appeals cannot be dismissed for non-prosecution and require speaking orders with substantive findings, ITAT remanded the matter back to CIT(A). The tribunal directed CIT(A) to pass a fresh speaking order after giving the assessee reasonable opportunity of being heard, considering submitted documents, and adjudicating all grounds of appeal in accordance with law and Rule 46A of Income Tax Rules. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s ex-parte order for failing to comply ...

Tax Appeal Ex-parte Order Invalid: CIT(A) Failed To Provide Hearing And Reasoned Order Under Section 250(6)

February 14, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Impugned communication rejecting application for input tax credit blocking lacked reasoning, amounting to non-application of mind and violation of natural justice...

Faceless Assessment - Non affording a reasonable opportunity to be heard through video conferencing - The court referred to Section 144B(6)(vii) and (viii) of the Income...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Disllowance of CENVAT Credit - Rule 6(5) of CCR provides that the provisions of Rule 6(1), (2) and (3) are not applicable, where input service received is used both for...

Violation of principles of natural justice - The court observed that while the show-cause notice provided details for a personal hearing, including the date, time, and...

Recovery notices and bank attachment orders - No opportunity of being heard - discrepancies between the GSTR 3B return and the GSTR 2B return - The High Court observed...

The CBIC circular enabled electronic voluntary self-initiated payments on ICEGATE e-Payment platform to replace manual TR-6 challan payments. Users registered on ICEGATE...

Disallowance of Expenses - AO erred in appreciating that nonreply of Section 133(6) notices cannot necessarily lead to disallowance of petty expenses ranging from Rs....

CENVAT Credit - Separate Accounts - Prima facie it was impossible for the Appellants to maintain separate account and inventory of Zinc Skimming used for manufacture of...

The amendment to Rule 6 (6) (i) of the CCR, 2004 by the amending Notification No.50/2008-CE (NT) dated 31/12/2008 shall be applicable w.e.f 10/09/2004 when the CCR, 2004...

Appellants engaged in manufacturing dutiable goods and providing exempted trading services failed to maintain separate accounts for input services utilized in both...

The High Court found procedural irregularities in a faceless assessment process. The Assessing Officer (AO) did not refer to summons u/s 133(6) in the show cause notice,...

Penalty u/s 270A - under-reporting of income - the assessee’s case would squarely fall under the exception provided u/s 270A(6)(a) wherein, the assessee had given its...

Benefit of exemption subject to the condition that no Cenvat Credit is availed - The appellant are eligible for exemption under Notification No. 30/2004-C.E. when they...

Classification of services - services of Electroplating surface coating and Electroless nickel plating provided by the applicant - The services of Electroplating surface...

Quick Updates: