ITAT ruled against penalty under Section 271D for alleged ...

Property Broker Avoids Section 271D Penalty as Intermediary Not Liable for Cash Transactions Above Legal Limit

February 14, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT ruled against penalty under Section 271D for alleged violation of Section 269SS regarding cash transactions in property transfer. The Tribunal held that while Section 269SS applies broadly to property transfers beyond simple buy-sell transactions, it targets actual recipients of funds, not intermediaries. The appellant, acting as a broker, merely facilitated payments between principals and wasn't the true recipient. Additionally, ITAT found reasonable cause under Section 273B, noting the relevant amendment to Section 269SS occurred after the transaction date. The appellant's limited education and role as middleman demonstrated absence of malafide intent. The Tribunal directed deletion of penalty, allowing the appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT ruled against penalty under Section 271D for alleged ...

Property Broker Avoids Section 271D Penalty as Intermediary Not Liable for Cash Transactions Above Legal Limit

February 14, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty levied u/s 271D for contravention of Section 269SS, which restricts cash transactions above a specified sum for immovable property. The key points are: The...

Addition u/s 68 - cash credit - assessee being a share broker - All the equity shares so purchased first came in the Demat account of the assessee broker and then has...

Capital gains - treating information contained in ITS as related to transaction of sale of immovable property - Assessee had pointed out how the two transactions...

Assessee received cash consideration from sale of property, deposited in bank account and utilized to purchase another property. AO accepted transaction in regular...

The case involved the scope of limited scrutiny and the validity of a notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny to...

Penalty u/s. 271D - Receipt of cash against sale of immovable property - The sale transaction is duly evidenced by the registered agreement / deed. Considering the fact...

Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee...

Penalty - Confiscation of foriegn currency - carrying currency in excess of prescribed limit - penalty reduced - AT

Benami Property Transaction - title over the suit properties - Moreover purchase of a property by husband in the name of the wife cannot be called a benami transaction...

The case pertains to penalty proceedings u/s 271D for violating Section 269SS and Section 271E of the Income Tax Act. The assessee received Rs. 18 lakh from a trustee...

Unexplained money u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE(1) - no explanation regarding source of cash deposit in savings account - case selected for limited scrutiny, thus...

The assessee, acting as a broker and intermediary, facilitated commodity transactions on the National Spot Exchange (NSEL) platform on behalf of clients. The...

CESTAT upheld penalties against customs broker for facilitating import of misdeclared worn clothing. Broker failed to exercise due diligence by proceeding without proper...

Revocation of Customs Broker License - forfeiture of entire security deposit - levy of penalty - the appellants CB besides obtaining the requisite documents should have...

Unexplained investment u/s 69 - family transaction - assessee has submitted that the assessee’s husband was a power of attorney holder of the property and could not...

Quick Updates: