HC ruled in favor of the petitioner regarding tax refund and ...

Tax Authorities Must Refund Rs. 6.05 Lakh Excess Adjustment and Process Appeal Under Section 250(6A) Within Timeline

February 27, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

HC ruled in favor of the petitioner regarding tax refund and appeal processing. The court ordered respondents to refund Rs. 6,05,030/- within four weeks, recognizing this as excess adjustment against the 2015-2016 assessment year demand. The HC determined that respondents improperly failed to consider prior adjustments when calculating the 20% outstanding demand requirement. Citing Sec. 250(6A), the court mandated expeditious processing of the pending appeal, directing the CIT(A) to resolve it preferably by May 31, 2025. The judgment emphasized that authorities cannot benefit from their own delay in processing stay applications and must adhere to statutory timelines for appeal resolution.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC ruled in favor of the petitioner regarding tax refund and ...

Tax Authorities Must Refund Rs. 6.05 Lakh Excess Adjustment and Process Appeal Under Section 250(6A) Within Timeline

February 27, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

HC ruled on tax settlement scheme interpretation regarding admitted versus disputed tax amounts. Settlement Officer erroneously deducted pre-deposit from disputed amount...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Appellant imported fermented and dried processed Sumatra cocoa beans which failed to conform to IS 8865:2003 standards as per FSSAI and BIS testing. Adjudicating...

Adjustment of excess paid service tax – rule 6(3) of STR, 1994

Suo motu adjustment of excess service tax paid – Rule 6(4A) - stay granted.

ICAI's Suggestions for Review of Income Tax Act, 1961: Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) prosecution proceedings are appropriate only where deductors deliberately do not...

The appellate tribunal examined the penalty imposed on the company and individual for contravention of Section 6(3)(a) of FEMA and Regulations 5, 6, and 13 of the...

Adjustment of excess payment of service tax - Sub-rule (3) of Rule 6 of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 have been amended providing for adjustment of excess payment against...

Sub-section (1) in Section 5 amended to not levy integrated tax on Extra Neutral Alcohol used for manufacturing alcoholic liquor for human consumption. Section 6A...

The appeal challenged the maintainability of an application filed u/s 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code seeking refund of an amount deposited as part of a...

The High Court held that u/s 54 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, when the input tax credit paid is higher than the output tax, the dealer is entitled to seek a...

Adjustment of excess amount of service tax paid - Rule 6(4A) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Adjustment cannot be denied on the ground that adjustment is possible only for...

Petitioner paid Rs. 8,46,84,821/- under Settlement Scheme for 2010-2011, against which Respondents recovered Rs. 19,16,74,501/-, resulting in excess collection of Rs....

Refund claim - Adjustment of amount against outstanding demand - Refunds have been adjusted against the outstanding tax demand by the Authority without following the...

Quick Updates: