ITAT upheld deletion of addition under section 68 regarding ...

Share Application Money and Premium Addition Deleted as Assessee Proves Genuineness Through Bank Records Under Section 68

March 1, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT upheld deletion of addition under section 68 regarding unexplained share application money and premium. Assessee established initial burden of proof through banking channel transactions. While AO confirmed service of section 133(6) notices to investor companies, subsequent doubts about company addresses based on IT Inspector's inquiry lacked specific inspection dates. AO failed to produce concrete evidence disproving transaction genuineness or demonstrating undisclosed income. Non-appearance of investor company directors alone insufficient to invalidate transactions. ITAT found CIT(A)'s deletion of addition justified as assessee satisfied section 68 requirements through proper documentation and banking records. Revenue's appeal dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT upheld deletion of addition under section 68 regarding ...

Share Application Money and Premium Addition Deleted as Assessee Proves Genuineness Through Bank Records Under Section 68

March 1, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Addition u/s 68 - share application money received as unaccounted cash credit - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction...

Additions u/s 56(2)(viib) - share application money received - share premium - assessee has proved identity and genuineness of the transactions by filing necessary...

Unexplained share capital and premium received by assessee company was its own unaccounted money flowing back in form of premium on share allotment. Assessee filed...

Addition on account of share application and share premium money u/s 68 - assessee has received share application and share premium money from eleven investor companies...

The assessee company received share capital and share application money from 13 share applicants. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition u/s 68, alleging that the...

In a case concerning unexplained credit u/s 68, the assessee proved the identity and genuineness of share applicants, although their creditworthiness was questioned. The...

Non-proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share premium received cannot be treated as unexplained income if sufficient documentary evidence is provided....

Addition u/s 68 - share application money/share capital and share premium as unexplained - The onus was on revenue to dislodge assessee’s documentary evidences and rebut...

Addition u/s 68 - bogus share capital & share premium - The assessee failed to prove that the transactions of share application money is genuine and the creditworthiness...

Share application money received - No evidence has been brought on record by the Assessing Officer to prove that the share application money emanated from the coffers of...

Assessee company successfully proved genuineness of share capital and share premium received from various private limited companies. Creditworthiness and identity of...

Addition u/s 68 - onus to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the share applicants - Both the nature & source of the share application received was...

The addition made u/s 68 for bogus share application money receipts was solely based on the statement of an unrelated third party, Shri Pravin Kumar Jain, recorded...

The assessee successfully discharged the onus u/s 68 regarding share capital introduced by the company director, a major shareholder, proving identity, creditworthiness,...

Addition on account of share premium received by the assessee u/s 56(1) - income from other sources - the addition has been admittedly made by the ld. AO u/s.56(1) of...

Quick Updates: