ITAT upheld deletion of additions under s.69A r.w.s. 115BBE ...

Cash Deposits During Demonetization Justified Through Sales Records and TNVAT Data, Section 69A Addition Deleted

March 6, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT upheld deletion of additions under s.69A r.w.s. 115BBE regarding cash deposits made during demonetization period. The taxpayer successfully demonstrated that deposits originated from legitimate cash sales recorded in books of accounts and verified by statutory authorities. ITAT found that cash generated through sales was properly credited in books and supported by TNVAT records and chartered accountant audit. The AO's allegations of abnormal sales patterns were rejected as based merely on suspicion without concrete evidence. Double taxation was deemed impermissible since sales were already reflected in accounts and offered for tax. The Tribunal concluded s.69A provisions were inapplicable as source of deposits was satisfactorily explained through documented business transactions.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT upheld deletion of additions under s.69A r.w.s. 115BBE ...

Cash Deposits During Demonetization Justified Through Sales Records and TNVAT Data, Section 69A Addition Deleted

March 6, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

Unexplained cash deposits - Deposits in regular bank account of the assessee, during demonetization period - the assessee was maintaining complete stock tally, the sales...

ITAT ruled in favor of the taxpayer regarding disputed cash deposits during demonetization. The assessee had properly recorded cash sales in accounting books and...

Additions against Cash deposits made during demonetization period in specified bank notes - assessee has been consistently holding huge cash balance which meets the...

The ITAT Delhi ruled on an appeal regarding addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE for unexplained cash deposits during demonetization. The assessee explained that the deposits...

The assessee received cash credits which were treated as unexplained income u/s 68 by the Assessing Officer (AO). However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)...

Cash credit u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - cash deposit during demonetization period - assessee's failure to maintain books of accounts u/s 44AD. Held that where exemption from...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash towards cash deposits made during the demonetisation period - AO did not reject the books of accounts of the assessee and has not...

ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of additions made under s.69A r.w.s. 115BBE regarding unexplained cash deposits during demonetization. The assessee successfully...

ITAT reversed addition made u/s 69A regarding cash deposits during demonetization period. Assessee's regular books of accounts showed recorded sales proceeds, validated...

Additions u/s 69A - Cash deposits made during demonetization period - there is no dispute that the assessee is running Petrol and Diesel retail outlet and he is the...

The appellant could not establish the source for cash deposits during demonetization. The Appellate Tribunal held that sales cannot be rejected solely based on higher...

Assessee engaged in business of commission agent (Aadatia) for agricultural products. AO made addition u/s 68 treating entire cash deposits in bank account as...

Cash deposits during the demonetization period were recorded in the books of accounts, with the source maintained. The Assessing Officer invoked Section 69A and charged...

Addition of cash in hand - cash deposit in demonetization period - income u/s 44AD - there was no justification to consider the sales of assessee to be bogus or to make...

Quick Updates: