CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant regarding unrecorded ...

Exemption Cannot Be Denied Due to Incorrect Tariff Entry When Issue Not Raised in SCN - N/N. 48/94-C.E.

March 7, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant regarding unrecorded audio cassettes, holding that exemption under N/N. 48/94-C.E. cannot be denied based on incorrect tariff entry, especially when this issue wasn't raised in the SCN. The Tribunal affirmed that exemption benefits can be claimed at later stages, citing Share Medical Care v. Union of India [2007]. The demand for 24% interest was set aside as Section 28AB of Customs Act became effective only from 28.09.1996, while imports occurred in September 1995. The appellant was liable to pay duty at 50% rate, but no CVD was payable under the notification.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant regarding unrecorded ...

Exemption Cannot Be Denied Due to Incorrect Tariff Entry When Issue Not Raised in SCN - N/N. 48/94-C.E.

March 7, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of denying exemption from duty on the import of specific goods due to a realignment of tariff headings. The Tribunal...

Classification of goods proposed to be imported - Mobileye 8 Connect - It is found that two eight-digit tariff entries are applicable to the impugned goods namely 8512...

Validity of SCN - corrigendum issued six years later from original SCN - Having perused both the original SCN and the ‘corrigendum’ issued six years later on 19th...

This case deals with the validity of a declaration under the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme (VCES) for service tax dues. The taxpayer was issued a show cause...

Classification of shampoo – Entry 48 and 63 – UPTT - In light of difference found in English and Hindi version in Entry No.48 of Notification, Hindi version would prevail - HC

Classification of goods - car seat Cushion Suspension wires - Steel hooks - The Authority for advance ruling extensively reviewed the function and use of the products,...

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

Jurisdiction - proper officer to issue SCN - Undisputedly, the bills of entry in this case were not assessed by the officers of DRI but by the officers of the Custom...

The Court rejected the petitioner's challenge to the show cause notice (SCN) issued u/s 74 of the CGST Act on jurisdictional grounds. The petitioner failed to submit a...

Exemption under Section 10(48) - Notified Foreign oil Company selling crude oil in India - Notification

Challenge to the Show Cause Notice (SCN) - it cannot be said that the authorities had acted without any basis in issuing a SCN. The SCN was issued on the basis of...

CESTAT held that appellant was entitled to benefit under N/N. 94/96-Cus for imported goods that were initially exported and returned. While the adjudicating authority...

Second SCN issued pending adjudication of first SCN subsequently withdrawn - jurisdiction of first SCN challenged - withdrawal of first SCN after issuance of second SCN...

Gratuity exemption u/s Section 10(10)(iii) - exemption limit raised to ₹ 25 lakhs

The court held that the show cause notice (SCN) issued u/s 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 to a deceased sole proprietor is non-est in law. A sole...

Quick Updates: