The ITAT held that the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) lacks ...

Dispute Resolution Panel Lacks Jurisdiction in Second-Round Proceedings After Tribunal Remand Under Section 144C

April 1, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT held that the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) lacks jurisdiction to direct the Transfer Pricing Officer or Assessing Officer in second-round proceedings after the case was set aside by the Tribunal, particularly when a final assessment order under section 143(3) read with section 144C(3) had already been passed. The tribunal determined that section 144C and the Income-tax (Dispute Resolution Panel) Rules, 2009 do not confer such powers on the DRP. Relying on Undercarriage and Tractor Parts (P.) Ltd., which established that DRP can only give directions in pending assessment proceedings, the ITAT ruled that both the transfer pricing order under section 92CA(3) and the final assessment order were void ab-initio and accordingly quashed them.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT held that the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) lacks ...

Dispute Resolution Panel Lacks Jurisdiction in Second-Round Proceedings After Tribunal Remand Under Section 144C

April 1, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Income–tax (Dispute Resolution Panel) (First Amendment) Rules, 2018

Dispute Resolution Panel - Reference to - Reconstitution of DRP at Mumbai - 1 - Order-Instruction

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) - The Tribunal noted that in a previous round of proceedings, a penalty under section 271(1)(b) of...

Power of DRP to enhance the assessment u/s 144C(5) - The Dispute Resolution Panel being an Expert Panel, is bound to ascertain the correctness or otherwise of the Draft...

TPA - the assessee cannot seek to raise an issue before the Tribunal in respect of which he has not filed any objection before the Dispute Resolution Panel nor has the...

Lack of jurisdiction of AO in issuing notice u/s.143 (2) - Change of residential address of the assessee - The Appellate Tribunal admitted the additional ground raised...

Income tax proceedings against company in Liquidation/dissolved The Tribunal noted that once a resolution plan is duly approved by the Adjudicating Authority under...

Jurisdiction of AO - Validity of notice issued u/s 143(2) - No objection were filed within one month u/s 124 - The Appellate Tribunal found that the notices were indeed...

TP - The findings or the premise taken by the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) in the subsequent year does not render the findings in the previous years per se illegal or...

Section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Dispute resolution Panel-Reference to - Reconstitution of DRP at specified areas of jurisdiction. - Order-Instruction

The High Court held that once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan...

Breach of principles of natural justice and lack of jurisdiction - Excessive tax demand as a condition for remand - time lag of about two months between the show cause...

CIRP Proceedings against the Personal Guarantors - the ‘Adjudicating Authority’ / ‘Tribunal’, has ‘jurisdiction’, to ‘entertain’/’initiate’, the ‘Insolvency Proceedings’...

Once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan remain payable. This...

Claim of interest on delayed refund - the petitioner was required to unnecessarily litigate in two rounds; in the first round, up-till the Tribunal and in the second...

Quick Updates: