Levy of penalty - document/invoice number has wrongly been ...

Court Quashes Penalty for Typo in E-Way Bill, Finds No Tax Evasion Intent, Deems Penalty Beyond Jurisdiction.

March 7, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Levy of penalty - document/invoice number has wrongly been mentioned in the e-way bill - no intent to evade tax - The court concludes that the penalty imposition in this case, based on a typographical error in the e-way bill, lacks jurisdiction and is illegal. - Orders imposing penalties, are quashed and set aside.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty - document/invoice number has wrongly been ...

Court Quashes Penalty for Typo in E-Way Bill, Finds No Tax Evasion Intent, Deems Penalty Beyond Jurisdiction.

March 7, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The Rajasthan High Court considered a case involving the detention of goods due to an expired e-way bill, raising concerns about tax evasion. Citing a judgment from the...

Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - Referencing the judgment in M/s Citykart Retail Pvt. Ltd.'s case, the Court observed that the...

Detention of goods alongwith penalty - Expired e-way Bill - The High Court noted that the goods were indeed covered by a tax invoice and e-way bill, with the expiration...

HC set aside penalty orders under GST Act Section 129(1) and allowed refund application. The appellate authority's dismissal was deemed unjustified as there was no clear...

The High Court quashed the orders of the Appellate and Adjudicating Authorities imposing penalty on the petitioner for transporting goods after the expiry of the e-way...

Levy of Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 - Errors in e-way bills - The Court emphasized that minor typographical errors in e-way bills,...

Penalty order - wrongful mention of place of supply in E-Way bills - intent to evade tax or not - The High Court noted that the incorrect address mentioned in the E-Way...

Imposition of tax and penalty u/s 129(3) - e-way bill had expired nine hours and thirty minutes prior to interception - The High court referred to previous cases where...

Penalty order - Part-B of the e-way bill was not filled up - intent to evade tax - The High court, referencing a previous judgment, ruled that such technical errors, in...

Levy of penalty - Compliance with the E-Way bill as required under the provisions of the CGST/UPGST Act and related rule or not - presumption of tax evasion in its...

The case involved a challenge to a penalty imposed u/s 129 of the Goods and Service Tax Acts. The court held that without proof of intent to evade tax, such penalties...

Levy of penalty - at the time of detention was that one of the E-Way Bills had expired - The High court held that mens rea to evade tax is essential for imposing...

Evasion of tax - Failure to produce the e-Way Bill in time due to certain technical difficulties - although the petitioner failed to generate the e-Way Bill on time, the...

The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

E-Way Bill was not properly filled, but upon inspection, no discrepancy was found between the physically available goods and the goods disclosed in the E-Way Bill. The...

Quick Updates: