CESTAT held that synthetic casting tapes are properly ...

Synthetic Casting Tapes Classified Under CTH 30059040 Following Johnson & Johnson Precedent, Not Eligible for CTH 9021

March 13, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

CESTAT held that synthetic casting tapes are properly classifiable under CTH 30059040 rather than CTH 9021. The Tribunal relied on precedent from Johnson & Johnson case which established that Deltalite Casting Tapes fall under sub-heading 3005.10. The Tribunal determined that the goods were not devices/instruments/appliances that would warrant classification under Heading 90.21. Regarding limitation period, CESTAT upheld the invocation of extended period under Section 28(4) of Customs Act, finding that appellant could not claim ignorance of relevant precedential orders from 1999-2000 when filing Bills of Entry. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT held that synthetic casting tapes are properly ...

Synthetic Casting Tapes Classified Under CTH 30059040 Following Johnson & Johnson Precedent, Not Eligible for CTH 9021

March 13, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Waiver of pre-deposit of duty - Import of Synthetic Casting Tapes - Classification of goods - import of Synthetic Casting Tape would come under Chapter 30 - AT

Bed sheets imported were correctly classified under CTH 6304 as bed spreads/bed sheets, despite being made of 100% polyester yarn. Although woven fabric of synthetic...

Classification of Goods - Imported one consignment of ‘Bed sheet’, declared as Polyester Bed sheet - The Tribunal noted that although the goods were made of synthetic...

Multimedia speakers imported were classified under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 8518 2200, not CTH 8519 8100 and CTH 8527 9990. Notification No. 49/2008-CE(NT) dated...

Mandatory penalty u/s 114A of the Customs Act, 1962 not imposed - imported goods as “Polyester Bed Sheet”- mis-classified the impugned goods - The case involves a...

Classification of Aluminium casting - whether classified under CTH 8511.00 or under CTH 7601.90? - Rule 2(a) of the General Interpretative Rules - When rough aluminium...

ITAT ruled AMP expenses did not constitute international transaction under Section 92B, as Revenue failed to establish existence of arrangement between assessee and AE...

Classification of New Trim Cutting Synthetic Waste - classified under CTH 63109040 or under CTH 5603 - imported goods are in the nature of waste used for manufacture of...

CESTAT ruled on classification disputes for various mobile phone components. The Tribunal held that Receivers should be classified under CTH 85177090 as phone parts, not...

Classification of a product - long pepper/pippali - appellant classified their product under CTH 12119099 whereas the department proposed its classification under...

The case pertains to the classification of imported goods, specifically Fork/Yoke 5th and reverse gear shift (parts of motor vehicles), under the appropriate Customs...

The case involves classification of imported goods, specifically bed sheets declared as made of 100% polyester. The revenue authority classified the consignment as...

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled on the classification of imported bed sheets declared as made of 100% polyester. The key points...

The High Court held that the Echo Dot (5th Gen), Echo Dot (5th Gen) with Clock, and Echo Pop devices are classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 8517 62 90, not...

The case involved the classification of imported consignments u/s CTH 5903 or CTH 5407. CESTAT held that goods were not classifiable u/s CTH 54071094. No...

Quick Updates: