CESTAT set aside the confiscation of 34,400 kgs of areca nuts, ...

Customs Department Failed to Prove Foreign Origin of Seized Areca Nuts Under Section 123, Compensation Ordered

March 25, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

CESTAT set aside the confiscation of 34,400 kgs of areca nuts, finding the Department failed to discharge its burden of proof under Section 123 of Customs Act that the goods were of foreign origin or smuggled. The Tribunal noted the goods were seized from godowns far from international borders, and appellant's claim of local purchase from Nagaland and Assam markets remained unrefuted. Consequently, redemption fine and penalties were also set aside. CESTAT ordered compensation of Rs.20 lakhs to appellant against seizure value of Rs.32.68 lakhs, payable within three months with 12% interest applicable thereafter, applying the ratio from a similar High Court decision.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT set aside the confiscation of 34,400 kgs of areca nuts, ...

Customs Department Failed to Prove Foreign Origin of Seized Areca Nuts Under Section 123, Compensation Ordered

March 25, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Confiscating absolutely seven gold bars having foreign make marking - Smuggling - Hyundai Verna Car - sufficient evidence to prove foreign origin goods - The Tribunal...

Disposal of seized/confiscated foreign origin liquor

Detention and seizure of betel nuts - goods of foreign origin and unfit for human consumption - There is nothing on record, to even have a prima-facie view that the...

Smuggling - foreign origin Gold - burden to prove - The tribunal clarified that the burden of proof under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962, solely rested on the...

Confiscation of goods - Smuggling - foreign origin Betel Nuts - Impugned goods namely betel nuts are not specified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962 and the...

Smuggling of betel nut and black pepper of foreign origin - The Appellate Tribunal observed that while the ARDF report suggested the goods might be of Indonesian origin,...

Seizure of goods as smuggled into the country from Myanmar u/s 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. The burden of proof lies on the respondent u/s 123 to show that the seized...

The seized gold lacked foreign markings and had a purity of 99.5% to 99.6%, indicating domestic origin. As it was a town seizure, the onus was on the officer to...

Smuggling - Confiscation of gold / gold jewellery - burden to prove - on all the jewellery, there are no foreign markings and hence, there is no reasonable basis to...

Absolute confiscation of seized gold - There was no reasonable belief with the DRI officers at the time of detaining/seizing the gold from appellant, the onus was upon...

Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

Smuggling - gold bullion of foreign origin - notified goods or not - burden to prove - The appellants have sufficiently discharged their burden of proof in terms of...

Customs Officers seized gold bars believing they were liable for confiscation under reasonable belief of smuggling. However, the gold was covered under proper documents,...

Smuggling - seizure of foreign origin gold bars - Burden of proof u/s 123 - Reliability of statements recorded u/s 108 - The Tribunal scrutinized the documents provided...

The Principal Commissioner of Customs in Visakhapatnam issued a notice regarding the seizure of 209,400 sticks of foreign-origin cigarettes (PARIS and ESSE lights...

Quick Updates: