Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2025 Year 2025 This

The CESTAT upheld the Commissioner's rejection of the declared ...


Customs Valuation Rejection Upheld: Relationship Suppression, Misclassification of Dredger Parts Under CTH 84314990 and 84137097

March 25, 2025

Case Laws     Customs     AT

The CESTAT upheld the Commissioner's rejection of the declared transaction value under Rule 12(2) of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007, finding the appellant had suppressed their relationship with the overseas seller and misdeclared value. The Tribunal confirmed the classification of additional cutter head ladder under CTH 84314990 and jet pump system under CTH 84137097, rather than under CTH 89051000 as dredger parts. The denial of benefit under N/N.01/2011-CE was sustained. The demand under Section 28(4) was upheld, with penalties under Section 114A against the appellant company (modified to exclude interest) and Section 114AA against the Managing Director maintained, while penalties under Section 112(a) were set aside. The addendum to show-cause notice was deemed valid with no violation of natural justice principles.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Misclassification and Wrongful Claim of MEIS Benefits - Exports of quilts containing cotton/polyester - Levy of penalties - The CESTAT found the appellant guilty of...

  2. CESTAT address the issue of revision in duty liability of 'antenna' regarding assessable value under Customs Valuation Rules. The tribunal found flaws in the...

  3. Revocation of courier registration of appellant - The tribunal observed misdeclaration of the quantity and misclassification of goods. - This judgment underscores the...

  4. CESTAT upheld the confiscation of goods and imposition of differential customs duty regarding misclassification of 100% Polyester Knitted Fabric. The appellant...

  5. The Appellate Tribunal addressed issues regarding the method of valuation of electrical motors, whether to apply Rule 8 or Rule 4 of the Central Excise (Valuation)...

  6. Rejection of value - Only in special circumstances particularized in Rule 4(2) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, valuation needs to be done under the Customs...

  7. CESTAT upheld rejection of declared transaction value for imported copper scrap (Birch/Cliff) under Customs Valuation Rules. Transaction value can be rejected based on...

  8. Valuation - Rejection of Transaction value - Demand of differential Customs Duty - the reasons given for rejecting the transition value, is against the provisions of...

  9. Valuation of imported goods - non & mis- declaration - adjudicating authority has not recorded the reason as to why he has resorted to the valuation under Rule 7 without...

  10. The case pertains to the rejection of self-assessed value of imported aluminium scrap and determination of the method for valuation. The key points are: rejection of the...

  11. Valuation - rejection of transaction value - although the supplier and the respondent were ‘related persons’ for the purpose of Customs Valuation Rules but the...

  12. CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the valuation of imported goods (ball valves/check valves/cartridges of brass). The rejection of declared value and...

  13. The case involved valuation of imported goods, undervaluation, admissibility of appellant's statement u/s 108, documentary evidence, computer printouts u/s 138C,...

  14. Dispute regarding valuation of imported goods under Customs Valuation Rules. Related parties involved, 10% loading applied to transaction value earlier. New Customs...

  15. Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates