ITAT overturned the CIT(A)'s finding that the Provision for ...

Provision for Claim Pay Out allowed as deduction based on actuarial report showing ascertained liability with minimal difference from actual payouts.

March 25, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT overturned the CIT(A)'s finding that the Provision for Claim Pay Out was created on an adhoc basis. The Tribunal determined that the assessee had established an ascertained liability based on an independent actuarial report, considering the Trust Deed, Scheme, and applicable agreement provisions. The provision created for AY 2019-2020 was less than the actual pay out, with only a 2.21% aggregate difference between provisions and actual payouts from AY 2016-2017 to AY 2022-2023. The assessee has since been granted tax exemption under s.10(46B) by the Finance Act, 2023. The ITAT directed the AO to grant deduction for the Provision for Claim Pay Out created during the relevant previous year. Appeal allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT overturned the CIT(A)'s finding that the Provision for ...

Provision for Claim Pay Out allowed as deduction based on actuarial report showing ascertained liability with minimal difference from actual payouts.

March 25, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The case involves rectification u/s 154 for disallowance of bad debts provisions u/s 36(1)(viia) in a co-operative bank's computation sheet. ITAT held that the mistake...

Validity of show cause notice (SCN) u/s 73 - demand based on improper Audit Report u/s 65(3) - In the present case, what is found from perusal of the show cause notice...

The Delhi High Court addressed the disallowance of provision for unsettled claims and Incurred But Not Reported (IBNR) Claims Reserve. The court held that the provision...

Disallowance being amount of State Value Added Tax (VAT) paid for earlier years - Deduction u/s 80IB claimed - Assessee became liable to pay VAT for earlier years - The...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered whether an assessee can claim deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the first time in the return...

PCIT's view that section 36 allows deduction only for bad and doubtful debts, not for provision on standard assets, was challenged. AR presented case laws allowing...

Claim of deduction u/s. 80JJAA - additional wages paid during the year - In case the AO has denied the total deduction u/s. 80JJAA of the Act for incorrect report...

The ITAT held that: The department cannot challenge the validity of the sanctioned scheme at the implementation stage as the scheme attains statutory force binding on...

HC upheld ITAT's decision regarding insurance company's provision for uncertain liabilities. The court determined that IBNR (incurred but not reported) provisioning...

Allowable expense u/s 37(1) - provisions for claim Incurred but Not Reported (IBNR) and claim Incurred But Not Enough Reported (IBNER) - whether such provisions are in...

Appellate Tribunal examined disallowance of claim for futures and options (F&O) loss by Assessing Officer (AO) based on report alleging stock brokers manipulated...

This case deals with various issues related to deductions and allowances under the Income Tax Act. The key points are: Deduction u/s 80IB for profits from an industrial...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case where disallowance of Gratuity u/s 43B was made due to a discrepancy in classification in the Income Tax Return and tax audit...

Deduction u/s 37 - Guarantee commission paid to State Government – allowed as revenue expenditure - HC

Provision made for leave salary allowed as deduction - HC

Quick Updates: