CESTAT set aside penalties under Section 112(a) of Customs Act ...

Penalties against financier set aside as knowledge of undervaluation not proven despite voluntary payment of differential duty

March 28, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

CESTAT set aside penalties under Section 112(a) of Customs Act against appellant who was characterized as a financier in undervalued imports. The Tribunal found no evidence establishing appellant as the orchestrator of undervalued imports or that he possessed knowledge of improper practices. Though appellant had financed imports and voluntarily paid differential duty of Rs.30 lakh, this alone couldn't establish culpability. The Tribunal noted significant procedural violations including denial of cross-examination of co-accused witnesses and failure to provide essential import documents (Bills of Entry and invoices), constituting violations of natural justice principles. The statements of co-accused lacked evidentiary value without opportunity for cross-examination. Appeal allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT set aside penalties under Section 112(a) of Customs Act ...

Penalties against financier set aside as knowledge of undervaluation not proven despite voluntary payment of differential duty

March 28, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

Voluntary surrender of income by assessee cannot be considered concealment. AO failed to prove concealment, merely concluded voluntary surrender as concealment....

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Penalty imposed u/s 114(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 for alleged abetment of illegal export by arranging lorries. Lack of admissible evidence showing knowledge of goods...

Valuation of imported goods - undervaluation - deemed relationship between GOI, OMIFCO and the Appellants - related party or not - Department has not produced any...

Misdeclaration and undervaluation of the goods - redemption fine and penalty - The appellants declared the goods as 'Stock Lot Polyester Knitted Fabrics', but the...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on a co-noticee who is a Partner in a Customs Broker firm for...

Extended period of limitation - demand of service tax with penalty - The provisions of section 73(4) of the Finance Act are not applicable because intention of the...

Clandestine manufacture and clearance of Sponge Iron alleged - undervaluation demand calculated based on seized documents - retraction of statements - Section 9D of...

Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

Valuation of imported goods - the onus of proving charge of undervaluation lies on the Revenue which needs to be proved by way of producing necessary evidence - the...

Claim of second sale exemption and the imposition of penalty u/s 12(5)(iii). The High Court held that when the burden was on the dealer to prove the factum of second...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Quick Updates: