The ITAT set aside the PCIT's revision order under section 263, ...

Revision Order Under Section 263 Set Aside as PCIT's Assumptions Not Prejudicial to Revenue Interests

April 1, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT set aside the PCIT's revision order under section 263, finding it was based on assumptions and not prejudicial to revenue interests. The Tribunal determined that section 69 was inapplicable as the assessee had adequately explained investment sources during the survey. The PCIT's calculations regarding valuation differences were incorrect, as the Rs.12,143 surrender was based on estimated valuation reports. Regarding ESI payments, the PCIT erroneously calculated Rs.17,298 instead of the actual Rs.9,819. The Tribunal noted that disallowance of late ESI/PF payments was improper, and the AO had properly verified these issues. The section 115BBE invocation was invalid as investment sources were explained and verified. The assessee's appeal was allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT set aside the PCIT's revision order under section 263, ...

Revision Order Under Section 263 Set Aside as PCIT's Assumptions Not Prejudicial to Revenue Interests

April 1, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest of revenue has to be read in conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the A.O. Every loss of...

Revision u/s 263 - Disallowance of STCG - FMV determination of shares - The Appellate Tribunal (AT) scrutinized the fair market value and share valuation process,...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - An incorrect assumption of the fact or an incorrect application of law will satisfy the requirement of the order being erroneous. The phrase...

The ITAT Chandigarh dealt with a case involving revision u/s 263 on interest income from fixed deposits. The tribunal held that AO correctly allowed deduction u/s 80P,...

The Commissioner's invocation of Section 263 for revision of the assessment order was unjustified as the twin conditions of the order being erroneous and prejudicial to...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

The ITAT addressed a case involving revision u/s 263 where the main allegation was the non-disclosure of agricultural income affecting the deduction u/s 54B. The...

Revision u/s 263 - revision based on the audit objection - borrowed satisfaction - The ITAT noted that the AO had called for details and evidence from the appellant and...

Exemption granted on Invalid F-Form – Invocation of revision jurisdiction – KGST - If there was error resulting in revenue losing tax, it would be prejudicial to...

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal against revision under section 263, holding that the PCIT exceeded jurisdictional authority. The Tribunal found that the deduction...

ITAT ruled against Principal CIT's revision under Section 263, finding the order procedurally flawed. The tribunal held that PCIT cannot delegate verification...

The ITAT upheld the Revision u/s 263 by PCIT, finding the AO's assessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue. The unsigned assessment...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - A reading of the same clearly shows that after having made a contradictory observation on issue of lack of enquiry of cash deposit aspect for...

The Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct relevant inquiries regarding the shares held as penny stocks by the assessee in GCM Securities Ltd. The Principal...

Revision u/s 263 - Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, for example, when an...

Quick Updates: