The AT adjudicated a challenge to a provisional attachment order ...

Financial Institutions Barred from Claiming Mortgaged Properties Beyond Settled Resolution Plan Amounts Under IBC

April 5, 2025

Case Laws IBC AT

The AT adjudicated a challenge to a provisional attachment order involving financial institutions and defaulting entities. Following the NCLT's approval of a Resolution Plan for one company and liquidation of another, the Tribunal held that financial institutions cannot claim release of mortgaged properties beyond amounts settled in the Resolution Plan. The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to resolve inter-se disputes between parties and directed financial institutions to pursue appropriate remedies under applicable statutes. The appeals were disposed of, granting liberty to seek recourse through suitable legal mechanisms, with explicit reference to Section 32A of IBC and Section 8(7) of the Act of 2002.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The AT adjudicated a challenge to a provisional attachment order ...

Financial Institutions Barred from Claiming Mortgaged Properties Beyond Settled Resolution Plan Amounts Under IBC

April 5, 2025

Case Laws IBC AT

You may also like:

Recovery of VAT from the purchaser of property in Auction - Attachment of mortgaged properties - It is hereby declared that the respondent No.2 had the first charge over...

Circular clarifies that insurance companies are not liable to pay GST on salvage/wreck value deducted from claim settlement amount, as salvage remains property of...

Scope of SCN - Banking and Other Financial Services - appellants is a non-banking financial institution - Only a company, corporation or cooperative society would fall...

The ITAT examined whether the takeover of immovable properties by a financial institution from the guarantor, against loans granted to companies where the guarantor...

Tax recovery proceedings - Right over property mortgaged - It has come to the knowledge of the Tax Recovery Officer that the defaulter has mortgaged the subject property...

Money Laundering - The impugned order confirming the provisional attachment order is passed without application of mind and without understanding the law, it is liable...

Section 43B inapplicable to LIC Mutual Fund as it is not a Public Financial Institution u/s 4A of Companies Act, 1956. List of Public Financial Institutions is...

CIRP proceedings - on the basis of parity being deployed by the RP in admitting claims of both category of financial creditors, there remains no reason to be aggrieved....

Deemed dividend addition u/s 2(22)(e) - assessee had mortgaged his properties for availing credit limits by the company and dried up his resources for getting financial...

CIRP - The Tribunal concluded that the security agreement was intended as additional security and did not absolve the debtor of its repayment obligations. The Tribunal...

Rebate claim – refund claim was time barred - rebate claim was rightly rejected as time barred but the re-credit of duty paid in Cenvat account is not admissible - CGOVT

Recovery proceedings - attaching the property and bringing the property for sale - The High Court observed that the impugned actions were indeed barred by Rule 68B of...

AT ruled against Bank's challenge to property attachment under Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). Despite Bank's prior mortgage rights and claim as fraud victim,...

Priority of secured creditors under the SARFAESI Act over claims by the Income Tax Department. The respondent mortgaged the property to the petitioner in 2013-14, prior...

CIRP - Unsecured Financial Creditor or not - Non-registration of charge before the Registrar of Companies - the mortgaged property, will form part of the Liquidation...

Quick Updates: