Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2025 Year 2025 This

ITAT held that reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid. The ...


Income Tax Assessment Reopening Invalidated: Lack of Cogent Evidence and Unsubstantiated Suspicions Render Tax Additions Unsustainable

April 5, 2025

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

ITAT held that reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid. The AO failed to establish a cogent 'reason to believe' regarding alleged bogus Long Term Capital Gains, merely acting on unsubstantiated information from Investigation Wing. The tribunal emphasized that 'reason to believe' is distinct from 'suspicion', and the AO's approach was casual and robotic. Without concrete material demonstrating nexus between entry operators and the assessee, the addition u/s 68 was deemed unsustainable. The capital gains from share transactions could not be arbitrarily labeled as sham profits. Consequently, the assessment reopening and consequent additions were quashed, decisively ruling in favor of the assessee.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment solely based on the information from a survey conducted by the Sales Tax Department, without independently examining...

  2. Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - CIRP proceedings - The proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) cannot be pressed into service to...

  3. The case involves the validity of assessments u/s 153A and 132 of the Income Tax Act. In the absence of incriminating material seized during the search, assessments...

  4. The High Court held that the Assessing Officer (AO) lacked sufficient material or evidence to reopen the assessment u/s 147 for the Assessment Year 2013-14 in respect of...

  5. The High Court quashed the reopening of assessments u/s 148, holding that the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer were cryptic, vague, lacking nexus, and...

  6. ITAT ruled against reopening of assessment concerning alleged unaccounted cash loans of Rs.11.05 crore. AO's action based solely on Investigation Wing's information...

  7. HC invalidated ex-parte assessment order and demand notices that were solely based on a previously quashed FIR. The department failed to conduct independent...

  8. Reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 - failure to issue notice u/s 143(2) - reopening of assessment is not valid as the Income Tax Department has power to conduct the...

  9. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reason to believe - there was tangible material before the AO to reopen the concluded assessment as the assessee is claiming huge...

  10. The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

  11. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 justified due to tangible material available with Assessing Officer (AO) to form reasonable belief regarding escapement of income....

  12. The summary highlights the key difference between the scope of total income under the Income Tax Act and the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and...

  13. The case pertains to the reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 of the Income Tax Act due to undisclosed cash deposits in the assessee's bank accounts. The key points are:...

  14. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reason to believe - The notice was based on alleged undisclosed cash deposits made by the trust during a specific financial year. The...

  15. The High Court held that the Assessing Officer (AO) had specifically called for and considered information regarding unsecured loans during the original assessment...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates