CESTAT examined the seizure of 3998.83 grams of gold from two ...

Gold Seizure Invalidated: Customs Department Fails to Prove Smuggling Claims Under Section 110

April 26, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

CESTAT examined the seizure of 3998.83 grams of gold from two individuals traveling by bus, determining the legality of the customs action. The tribunal found the department failed to establish reasonable belief for seizure under Section 110 of Customs Act, 1962. Critical procedural deficiencies were identified, including non-compliance with Section 138B and lack of concrete evidence proving smuggling. The absence of foreign markings on gold and failure to substantiate smuggling claims led the tribunal to conclude that the seizure was unsustainable. The burden of proof under Section 123 was not effectively discharged by the revenue authorities. Consequently, the tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the seizure and potential penalties.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT examined the seizure of 3998.83 grams of gold from two ...

Gold Seizure Invalidated: Customs Department Fails to Prove Smuggling Claims Under Section 110

April 26, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Customs Officers seized gold bars believing they were liable for confiscation under reasonable belief of smuggling. However, the gold was covered under proper documents,...

Smuggling - gold bullion of foreign origin - notified goods or not - burden to prove - The appellants have sufficiently discharged their burden of proof in terms of...

10kg of gold consisting of 10 gold bars, with 7 bars bearing foreign markings and 3 bars without markings, was seized along with cash from an employee of the appellant....

CESTAT appellate proceedings involving seized gold bars. Tribunal found insufficient evidence to prove foreign origin of gold, with purity ranging 995.7 to 998.9....

Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

CESTAT allowed the appeal against confiscation of 449.300 gms of fine gold and penalties imposed on the appellants. It held that the department failed to produce any...

Jurisdiction of Customs Officers for seizure or recovery of material in a search carried out in a DTA - Smuggling - In the case on hand, the search and seizure have...

Smuggling - Gold of Foreign Origin - Commissioner Of Customs (Appeals) quashed the confiscation and penalty - There were no grounds for reasonable belief at the time of...

Smuggling - Gold - the department could not adduce any evidence whatsoever to prove that the said two gold bars were smuggled in the two countries. Therefore, the...

Confiscation - town Seizure - Gold of foreign origin having inscription of 2(two) Swastika symbol - revenue has failed to prove reasonable belief that being the gold in...

Seizure of gold of foreign origin, silver granules and Indian currency notes - The High Court overturned the CESTAT's decision, emphasizing that: The statements made by...

CESTAT ruled against absolute confiscation of gold and penalties under s.112(b) of Customs Act, 1962. Officers seized gold based on alleged smuggling from Bangladesh,...

Smuggling - Gold - absolute confiscation - onus to prove - The Tribunal noted that the gold seizure occurred during a town seizure, and the gold lacked foreign markings....

Seizure - Burden of proof - ‘reasonable belief’ - Onus for proving the goods to be not smuggled - Seizure outside the ‘customs area’ - The Tribunal noted that the burden...

Smuggling - foreign origin Gold - burden to prove - The tribunal clarified that the burden of proof under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962, solely rested on the...

Quick Updates: